HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #15901  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 10:32 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverD View Post
Why spend a ton of money here when there is still so much room for infill development of all kinds of sizes all over the peninsula?
Because it's possible to do both... it doesn't have to be one thing or the other. There is also sea level rise, which is inevitable, so remediating the site, engaging in land reclamation, and building a sea wall could be a really smart investment in the long run. Moreover, the Sugar Refinery Site and AIM site are still two of the very first things people see arriving in Saint John Harbour, so I think it also becomes a matter of civic pride... we shouldn't just let it crumble away as a ruin, simply because the solutions are expensive.

We don't yet know how long Mark Carney will be PM for...

Such a project would be a huge undertaking with federal and provincial funding, and it would very likely be linked to port developments. Who knows if the next Prime Minister will be as eager to make big investments as Mark Carney is.



Here's almost 60 acres across both sides of the harbour that could either be re-developed, or literally reclaimed from the sea. If the Port gets 40-50 of those acres for their operations, 10-20 acres could surely be developed into mixed use developments along Charlotte St. and part of the former sugar refinery site.

Being located along the railway greatly facilitates land reclamation projects, which ultimately aren't that complicated of projects. It seems like the port is even looking at expanding its operations into Lorneville, which would be quite great, but there's still some huge opportunities for port expansion with land reclamation projects adjacent to their current operations in the core of the city. I figure we will see some further port expansion projects in Saint John while Carney is PM, so our city's leaders might as well try and work on getting some funding for residential developments in areas adjacent to port operations... like Charlotte St, or at part of a remediated sugar refinery site.



The entire West Side docks were created as a massive engineering project back in the 1930's... the recent port expansion, and further expansions suggested above are much smaller scale projects than the very creation of the West Side Docks themselves.

The Prime Minister literally never stops talking about building Canada bigger and better than ever... and Saint John remains one of Canada's most strategically located ports... that's why it's worth spending a ton of money, because it will be mostly federal and provincial dollars being spent. Moreover, in terms of those provincial dollars, Saint John has more than earned some big time infrastructure spending from the province, since we've been failed as a city by the tax code for decades now.

MP Wayne Long has said many times that only in Saint John do we have waterfront parking lots where in other cities such properties would be developed. Charlotte Street South makes Saint John look bad... imagine it re-envisioned as a street of row houses and a few restaurants or corner stores, with a substantial residential development at the end of the street at the former sugar refinery site. The Port could take back almost as much land at the reclaimed sugar refinery site, as it would be giving up for mixed use developments along Charlotte Street... and the result would be a completely transformed South End of Saint John.

The Central Peninsula would benefit greatly from further investing in waterfront and waterfront adjacent developments, but partnerships with the federal and provincial governments will be essential to making it happen... unlike much less complicated infill developments, which will be happening regardless.

Personally, I think it's very much worth spending literal tonnes of money remediating the sugar refinery site so it can utilized for both further port expansion, and some sort of mixed use residential development, especially if that means cleaning up and developing Charlotte Street south, which is perhaps the grimiest streetscape in the entire Central Peninsula. Again, none of what I've posited here should take away from other infill development around the central peninsula, rather, I'd argue such an ambitious re-envisioning of the South End coupled with further port expansions, would only further encourage development throughout the central peninsula and throughout Saint John for that matter.

tl;dr: Some big ideas are worth the price tag. I don't think we should sell Saint John short. It's worth remediating and reclaiming the sugar refinery site for port expansion and residential development. PM Carney won't be around forever. Saint John should dare to be bold, and think big while, "the builder", Mark Carney, is still the PM. Plus, If a tunnel between the West Side and Uptown can be part of the land reclamation solution by providing a huge amount of fill for the above outlined land reclamation projects... that would be quite terrific.

Last edited by EnvisionSaintJohn; May 11, 2025 at 3:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15902  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 10:33 AM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,628
Update on Lorneville Industrial Park expansion. The hearing before council is this Monday (12th) Hope Donna and Co. have their flameproof suits ready!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-bruns...one-municipal-plan-green-clean-1.7529976

Seriously though, I think the city is being fairly reasonable about this ( prohibiting traditional heavy industry like smokestack industries/emitting manufacturing, metal recycling etc and increasing required buffers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15903  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 11:47 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugsley View Post
You seem pretty rigid Envision on the belief that a skyscraper is a catalyst for growth in a city's core. However, it has been proven multiple times from studies and scholars that a single tower does very little to rejuvenate a downtown. In fact, most Urbanists and Urban Planning Academics would argue that socially and economically healthy cities are actually ones that have a consistent degree of mixed-use density across a dense and highly-walkable plat - think Paris, Barcelona, Amsterdam, etc. Cities with a consistent mix of these uses results in more people on the street and a more vibrant socio-economic environment.

I get this site is called Skyscraperpage, but it doesn't mean that your proposals are best practice. When I say walk, crawl, run - I will again repeat myself - I am referring to the need for the Uptown to prove itself as a place people want to live and worth investing in. For example, last evening I walked through City Hall and Brunswick Square. It was completely dead at 5pm. Even the City Market was lacklustre activity-wise, and this was right after work. But there was some activity on the street and the restaurant we went to was busy. That said, most were those that had driven into the core for the BTO concert, not locals who walked there or lived nearby - according to the owner.

If the Uptown is to grow, then it needs to see these empty blights turned around. You do that, not by building a single residential tower (or turning one into residences) and hope they spill out into the area - studies show that does not happen. Instead, you develop a variety of housing types in the area by renovating existing spaces, building new complimentary in-fill to the area's aesthetic, and other incremental improvements to improve the desirability of the area. These things are all happening right now, some by people I believe are active on this site.

This leads to more families and small businesses moving to the area (AKA - Gentrification), which results in improved streetscape vibrancy and activity, which in turn spurs greater confidence from private and corporate investors to make more serious investments. This is how Portland's Downtown was transformed. Small, incremental improvements that snowballed into a vibrant and desirable place to live. And NOW, they are getting a signature tower in their downtown like you'd desire in Uptown. That tower would NEVER have happened 20 years ago in a Portland that was dirty, full of empty storefronts, and had few people living there. However, it is feasible today because the area has proven itself as both desirable to live and economically viable through thoughtful and incremental changes that made it more desirable to live.

I'm not rigid about skyscrapers being the only type of catalyst for growth in a city's core... not at all actually. However, I certainly do believe they can be a catalyst for growth and development. Do you have a link to those articles or papers regarding single towers? I'd be interesting in reading that. Though, I take issue with calling any proposal for Uptown Saint John a "single tower", given its the most densely populated area of the metropolitan region, and already has quite a lot of mid rises and high rises as is. So any sort of 30+ storey tower proposed for Uptown could hardly be described as a lone tower or isolated development... though, that's probably how one could describe Moncton's proposed Infinity Tower, as it's certainly not being built in core of the city there.

As for Uptown having to prove itself as a place people want to live and worth investing in... how much more does it really have to prove itself? I guess it wasn't enough to draw you in... you prefer Saint Andrews... but Uptown Saint John generally considered the most desirable location to rent in the Saint John Region, and one of, if not the, trendiest place to buy in the entire region, if one can afford. West Side property values have basically doubled since I moved here in late 2016... whereas property values Uptown have tripled or more in that same time period. I don't think even the most desirable suburban neighbourhoods of Saint John's bedroom communities have seen such explosive growth in value as Uptown Saint John. So I really disagree that Uptown Saint John has to do much more to prove it's worth or value. I think it just needs an attitude change or change in focus more than anything... change the attitude and perception of the area to attract more young professionals who would want to buy condos (if they existed) instead of the heavy focus on young professionals who want to rent really fancy places. While at the same time, massively increasing the supply of affordable rentals throughout the Uptown core/central peninsula. However, that would be a threat to the way that Landlords are currently doing business, a threat to their livelihood, but it's needed.

I'm all for further gentrifying the Central Peninsula, and none of what I've suggested so far in these recent posts should take away from the many infill developments continuing to occur throughout Saint John. It's not about pouring resources into expanding and redeveloping Brunswick Square's office tower into a mainly residential development by taking them away from other developments... it's about turning something bad into something great, which is what it would do. Do they have a lot of studies on the impacts of turning office towers adjacent to dead malls into residential developments? Because, I still think building hundreds of residential housing 36 storeys above Brunswick Square remains one of the best possible single projects to revitalize Brunswick Square on its own, and it's not a project that would exist in a vacuum. 😅

Saint John continues to make a lot of progress with infill and residential developments Uptown, and around the city, but there needs to be more progress. I get where you're coming from, as someone with an urban planning background, but look at the rest of the world, and look at history... few great cities have developed in a rigidly planned manner. History is defined by people pushing for big ideas to happen, not those who follow textbook planning practices. As for the examples of walkable European cities, I'm not sure how much Saint John can really hope to emulate them, but it would certainly be nice to see. Though, I'd mention that cities in East Asia have far less planning regulations and height restrictions than the European cities you've listed... yet, cities like Beijing, Tokyo, and Seoul are highly walkable and just as fascinating or more to explore than the European city's you've listed as "the best". I'd argue the tall buildings and lack of planning regulations make East Asian cities far more interesting and fulfilling to live in or visit than many North American and European cities with far more planning regulations or height restrictions. Regardless, I don't think Saint John will ever have to worry about high rise developments getting out of control, at least not in our lifetimes, though, one can dream. 🥹 lol

I've never once Saint John adopt a "drop everything" and chase skyscrapers development strategy. I have; however, multiple times, suggested that Saint John try to get more ambitious with high rise residential, and not take such a sit around and wait approach, or a "crawl, walk, run" approach. There's a lot the city and our regions leaders could do better to even try and attract some bigger high rise developments to the Uptown core, or other areas of the city for that matter. So, please don't try and frame this as me saying the city shouldn't prioritize infill developments and should focus on attracting high rise developments instead... as that would be nonsense. It's not binary, and I'm not a fan of false dichotomies. There's a lot of good paths Saint John could take, not just one textbook path according to urban planning textbooks. I think the city should have a more multifaceted approach, and explore options to try and spur on high rise residential developments as part of the strategy to address housing needs not just in Uptown Saint John, but throughout the city.

Mark Carney isn't going to be Prime Minister forever, and it's likely his successor won't be as keen on big investments. So, I think Saint John and its leaders should strike while the iron is hot, and try and get some big private-public projects in our development pipeline while "the great Keynesian" remains in office. Saint John have the "most tariff exposed city" card to play, has one of the country's largest ports, and the largest oil refinery... the Prime Minister gets why the city is important, and so does the premier. If there's a chance to jumpstart high rise development in Saint John through a private public partnership in a major project, our city's leaders should take a chance and try and make it happen. No high rise residential projects have happened though purely market forces yet in Saint John, not even Fundy Quay. Whether its realizing the 36 storey potential of Brunswick Square, or a separate 20+ storey development, I think Saint John has a chance to get a really big development project in the pipeline while Carney is still Prime Minister and Holt is still premier... as long as we play our cards right.

Anyways, appreciate the discussion as always, and hope you consider submitting something for Brunswick Square Design Competition on the main board! Cheers.

Last edited by EnvisionSaintJohn; May 10, 2025 at 2:14 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15904  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 11:53 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
Update on Lorneville Industrial Park expansion. The hearing before council is this Monday (12th) Hope Donna and Co. have their flameproof suits ready!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-bruns...one-municipal-plan-green-clean-1.7529976

Seriously though, I think the city is being fairly reasonable about this ( prohibiting traditional heavy industry like smokestack industries/emitting manufacturing, metal recycling etc and increasing required buffers.
Good to know.

I'd really like to learn more about possibility of port expansion related to this overall project.



I questioned the need for this coastal parcel previously, but if it's actually something really productive related to the port... that could end up being the best part of this entire expansion .

Nonetheless, I still hope the city and its partners can come to some compromises that allow for some further enhancements and expansion of residential developments in Lorneville too.
__________________
Peace and Athabasca and Coppermine and Slave, And Yukon and Mackenzie—the highroads of the brave. Saskatchewan, Assiniboine, the Bow and the Qu'Appelle, And many a prairie river whose name is like a spell. They rumor through the twilight at the edge of the unknown, "There's a message waiting for you, and a kingdom all your own. — Bliss Carman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15905  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 12:54 PM
CharlotteCountyLogan CharlotteCountyLogan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 216
Going on what Envision said about Lorenville I'm not to sure how open the people of Lorenville would be to townhouses/apartment buildings/other big residential projects. The people there are nice people but don't seem like they would be very happy with a big project. They want to preserve their fishing village feel even though they are very close to the main part of Saint John.
Another thing would be wind. Any sort of tall building in Lorenville on the water would get pummeled by the strong winds that come off the Bay.
Just my 2 cents
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15906  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 5:52 PM
jonny golden jonny golden is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 2,880
Quote:
It's not about pouring resources into expanding and redeveloping Brunswick Square's office tower into a mainly residential development by taking them away from other developments... it's about turning something bad into something great, which is what it would do. Do they have a lot of studies on the impacts of turning office towers adjacent to dead malls into residential developments?
Here's a recent article on how Calgary has revitalized their downtown by doing exactly what you're suggesting. It's been a major success.

https://renx.ca/calgarys-downtown-strategy-yielding-big-results
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15907  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 2:04 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny golden View Post
Here's a recent article on how Calgary has revitalized their downtown by doing exactly what you're suggesting. It's been a major success.

https://renx.ca/calgarys-downtown-strategy-yielding-big-results
Thanks for posting. I really think there's something there... especially if we think really big and actually build up Brunswick Square to its designed 36 storey potential.

It seems like the right type of big, mixed use development project for a private public partnership in Saint John... and could certainly help revitalize not just Brunswick Square, but also be part of revitalizing the Uptown core in, along with the many other projects going on.
__________________
Peace and Athabasca and Coppermine and Slave, And Yukon and Mackenzie—the highroads of the brave. Saskatchewan, Assiniboine, the Bow and the Qu'Appelle, And many a prairie river whose name is like a spell. They rumor through the twilight at the edge of the unknown, "There's a message waiting for you, and a kingdom all your own. — Bliss Carman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15908  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 2:34 AM
bingun bingun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 1,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
Update on Lorneville Industrial Park expansion. The hearing before council is this Monday (12th) Hope Donna and Co. have their flameproof suits ready!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-bruns...one-municipal-plan-green-clean-1.7529976

Seriously though, I think the city is being fairly reasonable about this ( prohibiting traditional heavy industry like smokestack industries/emitting manufacturing, metal recycling etc and increasing required buffers.
I don't have anything planned for Monday, so I am going to sit back and watch the fireworks from the comfort of my home and the YouTube livestream.

The agenda for Monday became available tonight. It consists of 26 separate documents with hundreds of pages. I will take a look tomorrow and see if there is anything new.

https://pub-saintjohn.escribemeetings.co...nda&lang=English&Item=21&Tab=attachments

Any guesses on which councilors will vote for or against?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15909  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 2:32 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 1,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by bingun View Post
I don't have anything planned for Monday, so I am going to sit back and watch the fireworks from the comfort of my home and the YouTube livestream.

The agenda for Monday became available tonight. It consists of 26 separate documents with hundreds of pages. I will take a look tomorrow and see if there is anything new.

https://pub-saintjohn.escribemeetings.co...nda&lang=English&Item=21&Tab=attachments

Any guesses on which councilors will vote for or against?
I assume Stewart, MacKenzie, Lowe, and Sullivan are certainly going to vote for it. Norton certainly has west side political capital to burn, so he's probably a yes. Ogden and Radwan, more likely than not, unless some specific item bugs them (and it might). The mayor is a yes, if it somehow comes down to her. Harris is a wild card. Killen, probably not. Darling, who knows? I assume no.

Best case scenario is 8-2 for, worst case, 6-5.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15910  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 3:00 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,628
^ I'd mostly agree with that analysis. I hope the reason they are pushing this is that they have the potential for something big in the pipeline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15911  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 4:13 PM
jonny golden jonny golden is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 2,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
Thanks for posting. I really think there's something there... especially if we think really big and actually build up Brunswick Square to its designed 36 storey potential.

It seems like the right type of big, mixed use development project for a private public partnership in Saint John... and could certainly help revitalize not just Brunswick Square, but also be part of revitalizing the Uptown core in, along with the many other projects going on.
I periodically look at the commercial real estate websites here in Moncton, and there are a lot of listings posted for downtown office space that have been vacant for years. There must be a reason why these property owners wouldn't convert to residential, because they seem to be content to sit on empty space that generates zero income.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15912  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 10:04 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,321
Barrack Green Residences

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15913  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 10:31 PM
bingun bingun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 1,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
I could see that in the distance too on Friday morning, the project seems to be progressing well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15914  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 10:34 PM
bingun bingun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 1,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by bingun View Post
I don't have anything planned for Monday, so I am going to sit back and watch the fireworks from the comfort of my home and the YouTube livestream.

The agenda for Monday became available tonight. It consists of 26 separate documents with hundreds of pages. I will take a look tomorrow and see if there is anything new.

https://pub-saintjohn.escribemeetings.co...nda&lang=English&Item=21&Tab=attachments

Any guesses on which councilors will vote for or against?
There is nothing new of note in the documents, at least at a glance.

I will say that the city has invested a lot of time and energy into this; it is probably the most detailed I have seen. If they have put all this work into this for it to be voted down or for no development to happen, it will be a huge disappointment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15915  
Old Posted May 11, 2025, 12:14 AM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny golden View Post
I periodically look at the commercial real estate websites here in Moncton, and there are a lot of listings posted for downtown office space that have been vacant for years. There must be a reason why these property owners wouldn't convert to residential, because they seem to be content to sit on empty space that generates zero income.
Office to residential conversions are fraught with challenges and high costs from what I know. The Calgary conversions were made possible by multi million dollar government support AFAIK. Without that we are unlikely to see similar projects in NB.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15916  
Old Posted May 11, 2025, 1:54 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
Office to residential conversions are fraught with challenges and high costs from what I know. The Calgary conversions were made possible by multi million dollar government support AFAIK. Without that we are unlikely to see similar projects in NB.
That's what we should be aiming for, from both the province and feds, to make it possible.

With Carney as PM, and Holt as premier, I think it's possible we could actually get a major residential conversion done at Brunswick Square... and maybe even the expansion to 36 storeys, but it would definitely take a concerted effort from our local leaders to make it possible.

Last edited by EnvisionSaintJohn; May 11, 2025 at 3:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15917  
Old Posted May 11, 2025, 3:45 AM
ivegotaname ivegotaname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Saint John,New Brunswick
Posts: 153
Would the Saint Johners from here be upset if an ad in a Irish newspaper asked for all the Irish to move to canadian maritimes to our area of NB ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15918  
Old Posted May 11, 2025, 11:31 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivegotaname View Post
Would the Saint Johners from here be upset if an ad in a Irish newspaper asked for all the Irish to move to Canadian maritimes to our area of NB ?
All six million of them?


Here's Ireland's GDP per capita (at PPP) versus New Brunswick's:


Ireland's GDP per capita goes up according to PPP, while Canada's GDP per capita actually goes down according to PPP.

I think we might have a bit of a challenging time convincing them based on these numbers. Yet, crazily enough, there's quite a lot of Irish construction workers and tradespeople that have emigrated to or work in Western Canada, especially Vancouver. It would be interesting to see if the maritimes could attract some more of them too, because despite what the GDP per-capita figures show, many Irish are extremely discontent with the situation in Ireland, especially regarding the home affordability and supply crisis (which is much, much worse than even the situation here Canada's most unaffordable cities) I have a friend from Ireland that recently moved from Dublin to Vancouver, and he considers Vancouver affordable and easy to find/rent a place— compared to Dublin.

Ireland is perhaps the most height averse country on earth, with one of, if not the worst housing crises in the world. It's really something to think that Irish builders are moving to Canada in significant numbers to build homes and high rises in Canada, while back home, their planning permission committees deny proposals for high rise developments left and right. Ireland is in many ways a painfully British country, and in some ways, even more-so than England itself, as England is actually embracing building up to combat the housing crisis, out of necessity, while Ireland's planning permission committees continue to hold strong against such developments, despite a very dire need.

Again keep in mind, Ireland has over 5 million people in a territory barely larger than New Brunswick... while Dublin is a metropolis of 2 million. Yet, Saint John and Moncton both have higher tallest buildings than Dublin ... Halifax will look like a veritable Manhattan compared to Dublin within a decade, if Irish planning permission committees continue to hold strong against high rises. Hopefully not, for the sake of Dubliners.

If Irish builders find Vancouver and Toronto comparatively affordable places to live and work, and actually move to Canada. Imagine what they would think of the Maritimes and cities like Saint John, if they could come here and get jobs buildings homes in a massive push to increase supply, from building single family homes, to mid rises, to high rises... and actually be able to afford to buy a home for themselves, which remains nothing but a dream for most young people in Dublin, Vancouver, or Toronto.

...and Speaking of Irish builders... Prime Minister Carney is the most Irish Prime Minister of Canada since Brian Mulroney. Carney is so Irish that he even he had citizenship, until he gave it up shortly before becoming PM. Perhaps the PM will take a little extra interest in Saint John, because of its "Irishness", but the city doesn't really play up its Irishness nearly as much as it used to. Also, I find it odd that Saint John don't have a single sister city in Ireland, despite many people still calling Saint John, "Canada's most Irish City".



You might even say Partridge Island has a superficial resemblance to the island of Ireland itself.

Partridge Island is a very significant place to both Canada and Ireland and I think it's deserved a lot more attention than it has gotten over the years. Partridge Island is one of those places in Saint John that people will bring up about the potential for tourism, blah, blah, blah, but none of our city or provincial leaders ever actually do anything about it... Our MP at least had the kernel of a good idea with the plan he floated to run a ferry service to and from the island, but he seemingly gave up at the first hurdle (soil toxicity) and the plans have not been revisited since. Personally, I think it's ridiculous that soil toxicity is cited as one of the main costly reasons for why the island won't be opened up to the public, when looking back at that history, who caused the soil toxicity in the first place? Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the soil toxicity issues at Partridge Island be traced back to past actions by groups like the Canadian and British Armed Forces, the Canadian Coast Guard, and various governmental actors or agencies related to the quarantine station, military installations, and the lighthouse? If that's the case... shouldn't the government of Canada be largely responsible to finance remediation efforts at Partridge Island, if they are largely responsible for the toxicity to begin with?

I really think it's high time we actually try to do something about Partridge Island... and now that Saint John has two MP's, i hope this is a project that both Wayne Long and John Williamson could work on together, and show that Liberals and Conservatives, can in fact, work together and get things done across party line, or across riding boundary lines for that matter. The 200th anniversary of 1847, the worse year of the Great Famine, is not far away... Perhaps with Ireland's newfound prestige and wealth, the Irish government may even be willing to partially contribute to a project that opens up Partridge Island and honours not only the many famine dead buried there, but the tens of thousands more Irish that successfully emigrated to North America through Partridge Island.


While, I think Wayne Long was onto something with the ferries, in the long run, a fixed link is a far better solution than a ferry to open up the island to the public.

The pricetag on a pedestrian causeway would still around $30-50 million, and probably a much better and cost effective long term investment than a ferry system, and would put an end to the temptation of people illegally accessing the island, which continues to result in costly rescue operations every few years or so...

However, I think a pier or boardwalk would be a much more attractive and interesting option. Obviously, a pier here in Saint John would beed to be made of cement and other long lasting materials that can withstand the tides, currents, and storms of the Bay of Fundy, but I think a pier would be a far more visually interesting and attractive addition to the Saint John waterfront, which contrary to conventional thinking, does in fact exist, outside of the Uptown Saint John core.


I've been told before by someone who knows a lot about the hydrological conditions of Saint John Harbour, that if a pier was to be built at Bayshore, it would need to be built on the left side of the breakwater. Anyways, here's a very crude rendering of what a pier might look like at Bayshore Beach and connecting to Partridge Island:



Perhaps with Mark Carney, noted Irish Catholic and noted builder as Prime Minister, Saint John's two MP's Wayne Long (LPC) and John Williamson (CPC) could actually successfully lobby the PM to get Partridge Island funding to build the solutions needed to be safely reopened to the public... and so that this place important to both Canadian and Irish history can be preserved and appreciated. 🍁

Last edited by EnvisionSaintJohn; Dec 11, 2025 at 11:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15919  
Old Posted May 12, 2025, 12:56 AM
ivegotaname ivegotaname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Saint John,New Brunswick
Posts: 153
My mother uncles back in 1950s had sworn there is a tunnel from west side to the partridge island and said they went across and I've taken the rocks over there only just the once.
My Murphy side is from Wexford very well known in Enniscorthy they came across in 1700s and was staying with cousins who came obviously before them many a decade ago. My dad's hendersoms were from Northern Ireland and arrived in Grand Manan very wealthy I've been told some came to Kingston peninsula and others went to shires in usa
My Reeds were in Coloraine and came to saint john and boston in 1850s

I'm just trying to say I'm very much attached to all things irish and own a irish canadian flag
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15920  
Old Posted May 12, 2025, 1:10 AM
JakeNB JakeNB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Saint John
Posts: 194
$30-50 million for Partridge Island when we have a housing crisis? No thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.