HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1321  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2021, 4:47 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
Is there anything stopping Sacramento from building more high density urban core housing? I don't know but I'm assuming you guys have less NIMBYs up there.
Depends on how you define "urban core." There is a lot of high density housing being built in the central city (there are multiple midrise apartment buildings under construction or in the planning stages, and an enormous amount of small infill projects, alley buildings, ADUs, row houses etc), but that's just like 5% of a city that covers nearly 100 square miles, which is already very intensely developed with housing and offices. Outside the grid, new construction is mostly limited to single-family homes except in a few particular neighborhoods; a 2-story apartment building with a big parking lot near Cosumnes River College got denied not long ago because it was considered too dense for the zoning.

Some of the opposition isn't NIMBY but NIMBD: a conversion of a motel off Richards Blvd. to 100 units of homeless housing and 100 units of low income housing was blocked by multiple lawsuits by a real estate developer (who owns a vacant lot next door) and the business association.
__________________
"Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings."--Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1322  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2021, 4:50 PM
CAGeoNerd CAGeoNerd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 355
I have a feeling many companies and state agencies are going to be downsizing office space and converting a portion of their existing office space into "drop-in" spaces. It seems the pandemic has gone to show many places can largely operate without everyone commuting in and physically being in an office for 8 or 10 hours a day, and many people are by choice wanting to work remotely. We're going to see a big drop in demand for office space over the next few years as companies downsize on space they don't need (and save tons of money in the process).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1323  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2021, 6:38 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by urban_encounter View Post
Curious whether anyone knows what the plan is for vacant State office space as they continue to transition lower level workers to full time work from home? I have a few family members who work for the State all working remotely and even my nephew who’s at the bottom of the ladder will be working from home indefinitely.

I wonder if the State could expand CADA to include converting some of the buildings to apartments? They can’t be allowed to just sit empty. Of course this being the State of California they probably will

I feel bad for all the small businesses who endured a lot of vandalism from the protests, along with Covid closures and now the State pulling the rug out from under there feet. So far the city is quiet.
According to the report below, the Sacramento office market has shed 1.9 MSF in
the last 18 months. The vacancy rate has risen for six consecutive quarters.
The negative impact to the office market has been less severe than markets
like San Francisco where the rate has more than doubled over last year.
https://www.colliers.com/en/research...n@colliers.com

Last edited by innov8; Oct 6, 2021 at 7:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1324  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2021, 2:36 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post
Apparently there are a few electeds talking about legislation to facilitate doing exactly that (converting offices to residential), not sure if it's focused on state office buildings or offices in general. In the long run, several thousand more downtown residents will make more of an economic difference to downtown businesses than a larger number of commuters, plus residents will be more likely to visit those businesses outside of office hours (reducing the tendency of downtown restaurants to only be open 10 AM-3 PM because they only do lunch.)

While remote work is now going to be commonplace for office workers, it won't be universal. We're already seeing some returning to in-person work, and I expect there will be a lot more--in the long term, maybe half of office work will be remote, the other half in person (and some people with hybrid schedules, working in an office a couple days a week), which still means a lot of office footprint.

CADA is already well positioned to take on the task of converting surplus office space to housing, either through reuse or new construction. They have the administrative organization and the experience to do so fairly seamlessly, and they're running out of vacant blocks otherwise. CADA's mandate to provide a significant proportion of affordable units means that some of that housing will be affordable for the entry-level state employees who are largely still working in person--office techs, museum guides, facilities maintenance and groundskeepers. Despite remote work, someone has to mind the front desk, plants still grow and need watering, and that can't be done remotely.

I definitely hope CADA finally gives up the dumb idea of a planned state parking structure at 7th & R Street and build housing there instead; even more redundant than the office buildings are the grossly underutilized parking lots, public or private.
Awesome, that’s great to hear. Thank you and yes, residential units would be much preferred to State office buildings. I’ve always liked CADA. I love that they preserve the older apartments just as they were (or close to it).

Also agree 100% about the parking garage. Bad place to put a monolithic structure with no life. There’s been so much progress made lately on R Street. It would be a shame to do that to the R Street corridor.
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1325  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2021, 2:38 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by innov8 View Post
According to the report below, the Sacramento office market has shed 1.9 MSF in
the last 18 months. The vacancy rate has risen for six consecutive quarters.
The negative impact to the office market has been less severe than markets
like San Francisco where the rate has more than doubled over last year.
https://www.colliers.com/en/research...n@colliers.com

Thanks Innov8
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1326  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2021, 2:57 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,408

I realize this is skyscraperpage not midrisepage but figure midrise proposals are worth posting because there are a ton of them in the pipeline. Yesterday there was a plan submitted for a 5 story apartment building on Broadway and 27th, on a site currently occupied by a Subway store and a parking lot. They're proposing a "puzzle parking" system that lifts your car up like one of those little plastic puzzles, like the ones already in use at 16 Powerhouse or 19J.
__________________
"Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings."--Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1327  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2021, 8:37 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
J street is looking worse and worse. It’s just simply dreadfully ghastly, especially downtown.
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio

Last edited by urban_encounter; Nov 15, 2021 at 2:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1328  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2022, 4:43 PM
urbanadvocate urbanadvocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 213
Anybody that have access get a chance to read this article?

https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramen...rban-core.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1329  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2022, 5:44 PM
ljm ljm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 19
The new players in town

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanadvocate View Post
Anybody that have access get a chance to read this article?

https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramen...rban-core.html

By Ben van der Meer – Staff Writer, Sacramento Business Journal
2 hours ago
In the next few years, the shadows cast in Downtown Sacramento by towering new residential projects will be both literally and figuratively bigger than ones in the past.

Literally, because in many cases the projects being built are taller and have more units than most new projects. And figuratively, because the companies behind them are players on a national or even international basis, but relatively new to the Sacramento market.

To put it another way, the new contenders in the development ring are most definitely heavyweights.

Everything's relative, of course. Riaan de Beer, vice president of development at Vancouver, British Columbia-based Anthem United, said his company is relatively small in the multifamily development world, with "only" 40 to 50 projects active at any time.

"We're a large company for Canada," said de Beer, whose firm plans to have as many as four active projects in Sacramento by the end of 2022. Two of them, Anthem Cathedral Square at 11th and J streets and 1500 S at 15th and S streets, are already under construction.

For perspective, most of the biggest local players in urban multifamily projects, like D&S Development or SKK Developments, typically have somewhere from three to six local projects on their drawing boards at any given time.

But as Sacramento rose on the national radar in recent years as both a red-hot multifamily market and having high potential for its downtown to take on new life, bigger companies took notice.

How they came to Sacramento

Executives at each company describe slightly different paths to discovering development possibilities in Sacramento. For San Francisco-based Shorenstein, it was noticing the neighborhood of a potential development site at 601 Capitol Mall, said John Boynton, managing director for the company's West Investments Group.

Shorenstein was familiar with Sacramento through owning first Park Tower at Ninth and J streets, and more recently US Bank Tower at 621 Capitol Mall, next to what was then a parking lot at 601 Capitol Mall. "Sacramento is a market that's always been on our radar, but maybe not a high-priority market," he said.

During the building boom of the 2000s, 601 Capitol Mall was the proposed site for Aura, a 37-story condominium tower that never made it beyond planning approvals. When Shorenstein looked at the .89-acre site, Boynton said, a high-rise didn't make sense. But a multifamily project with ground-floor retail did.

The result is The Frederic, a nearly completed 162-unit apartment project where future residents will be walking distance to Golden 1 Center, Downtown Commons and the state Capitol.

Another developer planning what would be the city's tallest residential building took stock of migration patterns. Nashville, Tennessee-based Southern Land Co. has a philosophy of building where people want to live, said Parker Larson, the company's Bay Area-based director of acquisitions.

"There are a lot of metrics that don't have flash-in-the-pan attributes," he said, noting how cheaper real estate has for years drawn Bay Area residents to Sacramento. That trend accelerated when the coronavirus pandemic gave more office and tech workers the chance to work from home, regardless of where that was.

Next year, Southern Land Co. will make its local bet with a project on what's known as Lot X, the southwest corner of Capitol Mall and Third Street. The current plan is for construction to start then on a 30-story residential tower with 232 apartments. A neighboring five-story office building of mass timber framework is also planned.

Both Boynton and Larson said the development of Golden 1 and Downtown Commons also was a factor, providing selling points for housing nearby.

But for Anthem United, discovering Sacramento as an urban market with potential was almost by happenstance, de Beer said.

The company wanted to diversify into more multifamily in the United States, and started looking for good markets to do so, de Beer said.

Anthem United considered hot markets like Austin, Texas, Denver and Seattle, he said. But then its management realized they were already established in another one: Sacramento. The company already had a presence here after its 2015 acquisition of GBD Communities, a Roseville-based single-family residential developer.

"It was a pleasant surprise at the time," de Beer said, adding the migration patterns from the Bay Area were a big factor. "The major markets are increasingly competitive, and Sacramento is an easier market to get your arms around."

Like 601 Capitol Mall, the Anthem Cathedral site was entitled for a high-rise from more than a decade earlier that wasn't realistic anymore, de Beer said. But seven-story Anthem Cathedral Square, with 153 apartments and 10,000 square feet of retail, seemed like a bite the company could swallow.

Since then, Anthem has also scooped up the land and started work at 15th and S streets, planned for six stories of 137 apartments and 9,700 square feet of retail space. De Beer said his company hopes to announce a third project site in the region within the next couple months.

Not a one-time deal

In addition to being from out of town, the big development firms have another trait in common: They appear to plan to stick around. Anthem's de Beer said his company typically keeps ownership of its properties after building them. And Larson, of Southern Land Co., said it doesn't usually enter a market to just do one project.

"At Lot X, our intent is to build and hold for a long time," he said.

Shorenstein's Boynton said the company isn't openly targeting further local projects at this point, but the company would keep a close eye on potential opportunities.

"Our fund is focused on office, but they can also be mixed-use investments," he said.

Some of those firms' interest in Sacramento may be by necessity. Larson said that in many larger cities, there's not only more competition but a higher barrier to entry.

To entice development, Sacramento officials and planners have streamlined approval processes for many kinds of projects, especially those providing denser housing, near transit or both. That was a factor in Anthem United's decision to get active here, de Beer said.

In the 2000s, the hot real estate market both locally and nationally also brought in out-of-town developer interest, such as in projects like Aura. When the Great Recession ended that boom, their interest largely evaporated.

This time around, projections suggest Sacramento will remain a region with more demand for housing than supply years into the future, with new apartments making up less than 1% of all apartment stock.

Such demand has already pushed rents up across the region, including in the central city. One-bedroom apartments in new projects often rent for more than $2,000 a month.

So far, though, the high figures aren't affecting demand for those shiny new spaces. Projects opened in the last few years like SKK's Eleanor and The Press at Midtown Quarter in Midtown Sacramento have about two dozen available units between them, according to Apartments.com, out of more than 300 apartments overall.

Jessica Chase, asset manager for the residential portion of Shorenstein's investments, said pre-leasing for The Frederic began in September, and the first residents moved in just before the end of 2021. The company didn't share exact figures on leasing to date, however, and tenants for the retail spaces are still being negotiated.

Locals say, come on in

With bigger companies seeking their piece of Sacramento pie, local developers specializing in urban infill could be resentful of interlopers at a party they've largely had to themselves in the last couple decades

But the most prolific of those local developers, SKK Developments founder and President Sotiris Kolokotronis, said he's happy to have the help in addressing an overall shortage of housing.

"We have been really behind on new product," said Kolokotronis, who currently has a few hundred new urban apartments in the works and hundreds more not far from the central city across four or five projects. "I welcome bringing new capital to the market."

When he began developing in the 1980s, he said, the Sacramento region saw as many as 9,000 new apartments a year. Companies based elsewhere built most of them, he said. Now, even with new developers finding Sacramento, the need is still not being met, he added. Last year, just under 2,000 apartment units were built, according to commercial real estate brokerage Colliers.

Regardless of where the developers come from, they'll face the same local challenges: fierce competition for contractors, higher materials costs and fees that are much higher than the 1980s, Kolokotronis said.

Far from being discouraged, advocates for Downtown Sacramento are happy to see new players in town. Michael Ault, executive director of the Downtown Sacramento Partnership, said the projects by Southern Land Co., Anthem United and Shorenstein make good on the bet placed nearly a decade ago when the plan for Golden 1 Center and Downtown Commons began to come together.

"We're seeing capital markets and developers look at Sacramento a different way," he said. "I think it's validating for us, but we have to match it with an environment that's welcoming."

Ault said he's not concerned about the new companies to town leading to oversupply. On a weekly basis, he said, he still gets calls from people interested in living downtown, but stymied by a lack of options.

In another way, new residential spaces could be a key factor in Downtown Sacramento's future vitality. The coronavirus pandemic has left many office spaces at far from full capacity because their workers are now doing the same jobs from home much of the time.

More people living downtown could at least change the feel of many downtown streets, which have been noticeably light on traffic for the last two years.

"Everything is on the table with where we're trending," Ault said. "Some of these are pretty nice products. But we need to have a variety of price points."

For their part, the new developers in the city's urban fabric said they're not looking to upset or change the market. They'll take what they've made work elsewhere and fit it to what works here.

"Our attitude is, we're the new guys," de Beer said. "We're there to learn."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1330  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2022, 12:01 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
RT Train ridership?

Anyone have any passenger/ridership numbers for RT trains? It seems like the trains are always running mostly empty. Granted Covid took a toll but with the State moving mostly toward remote work on a permanent basis, I will be curious to know how RT can continue to run trains without deep cuts in service.
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1331  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2022, 4:31 PM
NikeFutbolero's Avatar
NikeFutbolero NikeFutbolero is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 98
Are there any plans for K street? It's depressing walking through there whenever I go to the Imax. It seems so dead and lacking anything worth keeping me there.
__________________
SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1332  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2022, 1:29 AM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by urban_encounter View Post
Anyone have any passenger/ridership numbers for RT trains? It seems like the trains are always running mostly empty. Granted Covid took a toll but with the State moving mostly toward remote work on a permanent basis, I will be curious to know how RT can continue to run trains without deep cuts in service.
Ridership actually just spiked this month due to the increases in gas prices, and generally when RT ridership goes up for that reason, it stays up for a while, because people realize that riding transit isn't as bad as they imagine it would be and are likely to keep riding for a while. The larger issue right now isn't ridership, it's personnel--there's a shortage of bus drivers and light rail operators.

Regarding broader trends, I've been riding occasionally the whole time, and have noticed trains are getting fuller, and offices downtown are starting to fill again, plus there are an extra 10,000 or so people living in the central city (including Railyards/Richards) so there are more people for whom transit is quite accessible and convenient as a way to get around. Add to that a bump in ridership due to high gas prices, and the latest proposal to address high gas prices could include grants to fund free transit rides for the next 3 months, and it might give local ridership a shot in the arm. Now if they can just hire more drivers and start replacing the older LRVs with the new Siemens S70s they have on order!
__________________
"Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings."--Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1333  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2022, 4:13 AM
Pistola916 Pistola916 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SAN FRANCISCO/SACRAMENTO
Posts: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post
Now if they can just hire more drivers and start replacing the older LRVs with the new Siemens S70s they have on order!
Yeah, for a city that builds light rail cars for all of North America, I always wonder why we have some of the ugliest light rail cars?

We should be having the best of the best. Hopefully, the new low floor LRVs are not only practical on the inside but modern looking on the outside.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1334  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2022, 4:37 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pistola916 View Post
Yeah, for a city that builds light rail cars for all of North America, I always wonder why we have some of the ugliest light rail cars?

We should be having the best of the best. Hopefully, the new low floor LRVs are not only practical on the inside but modern looking on the outside.
We're still using a lot of the cars we got back in 1986 along with the circa 2000 CAF cars, and there's no "locals discount" so we get what we can pay for, which generally isn't much due to our regional unwillingness to fund transit at the state and local levels. Although my personal vote for "ugliest light rail vehicles" are Santa Clara VTA's Kinki Sharyo cars, which look like they're made out of cardboard and look obsolete even though they're comparatively new. Even their old UTDC cars, replaced by the Kinki Sharyo cars, which we rehabbed for use on the Blue Line, have a certain retro vibe to them. The S70s are fairly nice looking, though, shouldn't be too long before they start running on the Gold Line.
__________________
"Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings."--Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1335  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2022, 7:52 PM
SacTownAndy's Avatar
SacTownAndy SacTownAndy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Bridge District, West Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,263
Have you guys seen the new "Old Sacramento Waterfront" neon sign off I-5 on top of the railroad museum? Love placemaking things like this. Can't wait to see it lit up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1336  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2022, 9:31 PM
Dieler Dieler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 88
Looks like site clearing work has begun for the low income housing project in the rail yards @ 7th and G Streets. Anyone have more information and a rendering of this project?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1337  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2022, 12:01 AM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,408
Wong Center, 150 units, 40-60% AMI affordability (meaning it's income limited to folks making about $30-40K/year, or those with Housing Choice Vouchers), 100% senior housing.
__________________
"Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings."--Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1338  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2022, 2:18 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,083
See drone view of demolition of former Arco Arena, once home to the Kings, in Sacramento

Read more at: https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/ar...#storylink=cpy
https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article264351121.html

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1339  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2022, 8:27 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,083


Sacramento’s office market saw a deep drop in tenant demand in the third quarter and
went into negative territory. As reported by Colliers Sacramento, the market net
absorption fell to its lowest total in 22 years as tenant demand wavers. Sacramento
recorded a -646,086 square feet surpassing 2.9 million square feet and more than five
percent of the markets inventory. Colliers also reporting that it’s unlikely to move
towards stabilization until mid-year 2023.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1340  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2022, 11:39 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,408
Welp, if we can convert office buildings into boutique hotels, we can convert some of them into housing!
__________________
"Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings."--Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:38 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.