HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1161  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 8:45 PM
moorhosj moorhosj is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baronvonellis View Post
Well Austin is a food dessert. There should be city TIF money to build a full service grocery store at least! It's crazy that' it's only a mile away from Frank Lloyd Wrights home, but it may as well be in another country. I would hope that Oak Park would spill over into Austin, but I suppose that's not going to happen anytime soon.
There's only 1 small park in Austin, Lafollette Park. More parkland could help the quality of life.

Ultimately, we need more police officers and to bring crime down in these area's though.
Columbus Park is also in Austin.

The real question is why does a neighborhood next to a thriving suburb, with it's own pockets of prosperity (The Island & Galewood) and with significant transit options (Cicero Ave, Eisenhower, Blue Line, Green Line and Metra) face such issues? Food desserts don't help, but something larger needs to create a catalyst for investment and development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1162  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 9:57 PM
OrdoSeclorum OrdoSeclorum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 584
Fun fact, the median value of a home in Chicago's Austin neighborhood--one of the city's worst--is $175,000. The median value of a home in metro Detroit is $145,000. A nice fact to have handy the next time a troll tries to compare the two cities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1163  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 10:22 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
^ Some data a while back also showed that Austin had the highest year over year home price growth in the city. Something is going right over there....
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1164  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 10:41 PM
IrishIllini IrishIllini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Some data a while back also showed that Austin had the highest year over year home price growth in the city. Something is going right over there....
That's what so confusing about Austin. One analysis will depict a community that is clearly over performing/exceeding expectations and another shows a troubled community with glaring socioeconomic issues. It's definitely a diamond in the rough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1165  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 11:12 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Austin has had the 8th most amount of sales on realtor.com of the 77 community areas for December 2017 thru February 2018 combined with 190 total (condos, SFH, multi unit buildings, etc). This is more than the Loop, Lincoln Square, Edgewater, North Center, Irving Park, Near South Side, etc. In December it ranked 7th highest tied with West Ridge.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1166  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2018, 12:11 AM
OrdoSeclorum OrdoSeclorum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishIllini View Post
That's what so confusing about Austin. One analysis will depict a community that is clearly over performing/exceeding expectations and another shows a troubled community with glaring socioeconomic issues. It's definitely a diamond in the rough.
I've driven through Austin a few times, mostly on Division and Chicago but also a few side streets and I've always found its reputation to be incongruous with what I see in person. There's families doing stuff and some interesting looking businesses and well maintained homes. It doesn't seem prosperous, but just looks normal working class to me. Like, I imagine an admin at my doctor's office and my cable installer living in a house there with a couple rugrats. I don't claim to have the whole picture, of course, but it seems different to me than parts of the Southside that immediately appear obviously blighted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1167  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2018, 12:31 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrdoSeclorum View Post
I've driven through Austin a few times, mostly on Division and Chicago but also a few side streets and I've always found its reputation to be incongruous with what I see in person. There's families doing stuff and some interesting looking businesses and well maintained homes. It doesn't seem prosperous, but just looks normal working class to me. Like, I imagine an admin at my doctor's office and my cable installer living in a house there with a couple rugrats. I don't claim to have the whole picture, of course, but it seems different to me than parts of the Southside that immediately appear obviously blighted.
Austin is the 2nd largest (by 2016 estimates) community area in Chicago by population - almost 100,000 people. Just like any other area, the majority of the people who live there are normal everyday people.

Your comment about the south side though...you should probably drive through more of it. Obviously there are blighted areas with areas like Englewood being the most I've seen, but there's many areas of the South Side that are essentially the same story as what you're saying about Austin. They are completely normal and decently to well maintained for the most part. There are numerous areas I've been to and driven through where if you blind folded someone and took them there, they'd probably think they were on the NW side somewhere or even in a few spots areas like Uptown or Rogers Park.

Chatham: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.7451...7i13312!8i6656

South Shore: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.7549...7i13312!8i6656

South Chicago: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.7409...7i13312!8i6656

Greater Grand Crossing: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.7610...7i13312!8i6656

Roseland: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.7007...7i13312!8i6656

Auburn Gresham: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.7511...7i13312!8i6656

West Pullman: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.6700...7i13312!8i6656

Calumet Heights: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.7332...7i13312!8i6656


I think that if you only drive through the commercial streets of the areas like above, you might believe it's all blighted, bombed out, etc but if you actually go and drive in the neighborhoods themselves you'll see that's not necessarily true. Personally the most blighted parts of town I've visited were areas of Washington Park, Woodlawn, Englewood, West Englewood (parts), North Lawndale (I forget what Pink Line stop it is but a few blocks in South Lawndale versus a few blocks north in North Lawndale is like night and day - goes from a normal area in South Lawndale to pretty blighted in North Lawndale pretty quickly), East and West Garfield Park and maybe even parts of Bronzeville (but that's quickly erasing). The ones I showed above though I've been to and through and it's not what most people think in the actual neighborhoods.

Just look at some of the multi unit housing stock too. Most people would easily confuse this with a north side neighborhood like Lakeview, Uptown, etc:
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.7581...7i13312!8i6656

Quite honestly, if the Metra Electric converted to a city train line, you'd easily start to see some of the areas like around where I just linked to get more people seriously looking to move there. The housing stock in many areas if fairly nice and even nice and it's not bombed out like parts of Englewood are.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing

Last edited by marothisu; Mar 10, 2018 at 12:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1168  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2018, 4:42 AM
OrdoSeclorum OrdoSeclorum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post

Your comment about the south side though...you should probably drive through more of it. Obviously there are blighted areas with areas like Englewood being the most I've seen, but there's many areas of the South Side that are essentially the same story as what you're saying about Austin. They are completely normal and decently to well maintained for the most part. There are numerous areas I've been to and driven through where if you blind folded someone and took them there, they'd probably think they were on the NW side somewhere or even in a few spots areas like Uptown or Rogers Park.
Oh yeah. My language was imprecise. I meant that Austin has the worst reputation on the West Side, and it's corollaries on the South Side seem much more blighted. I've been straight-up shocked in the past how lovely some of the blocks are on the South Side, though. There was a period of time when I'd randomly get off the Skyway and then meander over to West Town on random streets and I couldn't believe how good the bones and architecture were in some spots. (But I was also in some spots where I was like, "Okay. I'm going to dial nine-one...") Once my plane circled over a small neighborhood that was leafy as heck and looked like it was full of stone Colonial and Cape Cod houses and I've never been able to find it on Google Earth. Pretty sure it wasn't Beverly. I'm starting to think I imagined it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1169  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2018, 4:14 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
A bit over a month old but good to see

http://www.ttnews.com/articles/flexp...office-chicago

Truth is, I’m guessing there are countless expansions/openings like this flying under the radar.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1170  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2018, 1:29 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
Really great stuff from Bill Testa of the Chicago Fed’s blog. If you read the whole article it breaks things down by ethnicity and compares the city and the burbs. This is the kind of great, factual stuff that the major media outlets will never spend the time discussing:

Trends in Education and Income in Chicago

DECEMBER 12, 2017

Harvard economist Edward Glaeser shows that education is one of the strongest predictors of urban economic growth. This is particularly the case for older cities like Chicago. One of the reasons for this is that a higher density of college-educated workers is associated with higher levels of worker productivity.

There is very good news for Chicago. Recent data for 2016 from the United States Census Bureau’s American Community Survey shows that the city of Chicago now has the highest percentage of college graduates of the seven largest cities in the United States (Table 1). Almost 2 out of 5 adults twenty-five and older in Chicago have at least a bachelor’s degree. Chicago beats New York City, Los Angeles, San Antonio, Houston, Phoenix, and Philadelphia. Of the ten largest cities, only San Diego and San Jose have higher levels of educational attainment as measured by the percentage of adults with at least a bachelor’s degree.

If the sample is limited to non-Hispanic whites, Chicago even beats San Diego and San Jose, the home of Silicon Valley. For this population, over 3 in 5 have a college degree in Chicago. In some community areas in Chicago like Lincoln Park, Lakeview, and the Loop, about 4 out of 5 have a college degree.

One of the reasons for Chicago’s success in this arena is that the city of Chicago is an attractive place to live and work for college graduates, especially young grads. Over half of the young college graduates in the Chicago metropolitan area live in the city of Chicago. This is up from about forty percent in 1990.

Another reason is that migrants to Chicago are more likely to have a college degree. Last year about 3 of 4 migrants to Chicago from other states and from abroad had a college degree. Ten years ago only about 1 in 2 migrants to Chicago had a college degree. It is particularly noteworthy that in 2016 seventy-three percent of foreign migrants to Chicago had a college degree.

If one goes back in time, Census data indicates that adults in the city of Chicago were significantly less educated than their suburban counterparts. This is no longer the case. The percentage with a college degree in Chicago is higher now than in the suburbs of the Chicago metropolitan area although some suburbs have higher levels of attainment (Table 2). For example, 2 out of 3 residents of Evanston have at least a bachelor’s degree.

Although non-Hispanic whites who account for about one-third of the population of Chicago are doing well, the situation for African-Americans and Hispanics is more mixed. Of the ten largest cities in the United States, African-Americans in Chicago rank seventh and Hispanics rank ninth in the percentage of adults with a college education.

Read the rest here:
http://midwest.chicagofedblogs.org/?p=3048
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1171  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2018, 2:37 PM
Halsted & Villagio Halsted & Villagio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hyde Park
Posts: 250
"Ahead of Obama center arrival, home sales are booming in small enclave of Jackson Park Highlands...."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...0223-story.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1172  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2018, 4:49 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
Quote:
Bill Testa's blog
In regards to my above post, I'd like to add that that rapid increase in Chicago's educated population % cannot just be attributed to the exodus of lower educated people from the city.

If you look at the tables in the article, the sheer numbers of college educated people of all ethnicities is increasing by a large margin. And yes, the city is way out shining the suburbs in most categories.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1173  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2018, 6:27 PM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Rumors of massive layoffs at Motorola’s Chicago office

Ouch!

https://9to5google.com/2018/03/08/ru...ayoffs-moto-z/


Well all of these companies are hiring.




https://www.builtinchicago.org/2018/...-and-inclusion

Bring your whole self: How 9 Chicago tech companies are building more inclusive workplaces


by Michael Hines

|March 9, 2018

We spoke to leaders at nine Chicago tech companies ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1174  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2018, 7:27 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Really great stuff from Bill Testa of the Chicago Fed’s blog. If you read the whole article it breaks things down by ethnicity and compares the city and the burbs. This is the kind of great, factual stuff that the major media outlets will never spend the time discussing:

Trends in Education and Income in Chicago

DECEMBER 12, 2017

Harvard economist Edward Glaeser shows that education is one of the strongest predictors of urban economic growth. This is particularly the case for older cities like Chicago. One of the reasons for this is that a higher density of college-educated workers is associated with higher levels of worker productivity.

There is very good news for Chicago. Recent data for 2016 from the United States Census Bureau’s American Community Survey shows that the city of Chicago now has the highest percentage of college graduates of the seven largest cities in the United States (Table 1). Almost 2 out of 5 adults twenty-five and older in Chicago have at least a bachelor’s degree. Chicago beats New York City, Los Angeles, San Antonio, Houston, Phoenix, and Philadelphia. Of the ten largest cities, only San Diego and San Jose have higher levels of educational attainment as measured by the percentage of adults with at least a bachelor’s degree.

If the sample is limited to non-Hispanic whites, Chicago even beats San Diego and San Jose, the home of Silicon Valley. For this population, over 3 in 5 have a college degree in Chicago. In some community areas in Chicago like Lincoln Park, Lakeview, and the Loop, about 4 out of 5 have a college degree.

One of the reasons for Chicago’s success in this arena is that the city of Chicago is an attractive place to live and work for college graduates, especially young grads. Over half of the young college graduates in the Chicago metropolitan area live in the city of Chicago. This is up from about forty percent in 1990.

Another reason is that migrants to Chicago are more likely to have a college degree. Last year about 3 of 4 migrants to Chicago from other states and from abroad had a college degree. Ten years ago only about 1 in 2 migrants to Chicago had a college degree. It is particularly noteworthy that in 2016 seventy-three percent of foreign migrants to Chicago had a college degree.

If one goes back in time, Census data indicates that adults in the city of Chicago were significantly less educated than their suburban counterparts. This is no longer the case. The percentage with a college degree in Chicago is higher now than in the suburbs of the Chicago metropolitan area although some suburbs have higher levels of attainment (Table 2). For example, 2 out of 3 residents of Evanston have at least a bachelor’s degree.

Although non-Hispanic whites who account for about one-third of the population of Chicago are doing well, the situation for African-Americans and Hispanics is more mixed. Of the ten largest cities in the United States, African-Americans in Chicago rank seventh and Hispanics rank ninth in the percentage of adults with a college education.

Read the rest here:
http://midwest.chicagofedblogs.org/?p=3048
Most, but not all, of this has been written about in Crains already. There were some interesting tidbits that are in here that didn't make it into Crains but were known. The thing he misses is that the African American college education percentage, while overall still not great, went up one of the highest of any large city in the US.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1175  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2018, 10:30 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
^ There is definitely more in here than the Crains analysis.

Another telling trend: the rate of increase in college educated people in the city is way higher than the burbs for white and Hispanics. It’s about the same for Asians, while for blacks it appears that the rate of increase is actually higher in the burbs than the city.

This means that while the rate of increase in black college educated people in Chicago is higher than any other city, the suburbs are outperforming still.

Things going in some crazy directions!
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1176  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2018, 2:22 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ There is definitely more in here than the Crains analysis.

Another telling trend: the rate of increase in college educated people in the city is way higher than the burbs for white and Hispanics. It’s about the same for Asians, while for blacks it appears that the rate of increase is actually higher in the burbs than the city.

This means that while the rate of increase in black college educated people in Chicago is higher than any other city, the suburbs are outperforming still.

Things going in some crazy directions!
Crain's has had 5-10 articles on this over the last 6 or 12 months. It wasn't just in one or two articles - as the guy who provided most of the data for them anonymously, trust me. There is some other stuff in the link you posted for sure, but a lot of the other stuff has been in Crains articles spread about.

The rate of increase of black college educated people is faster than a lot of cities but I believe a few smaller ones had a higher percentage. The suburbs are outperforming the city but both are doing OK in this regard. The suburbs had an increase of over 25,000 college educated people in this group from 2010 to 2016 (27.3% increase) while the city had just under +15,000 (15% increase). The suburbs raise the percentage from 21% to 24.6% while the city raised the percentage from 17.8% to 21.3% - both were around 3.5% raise in overall percentage.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1177  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2018, 11:27 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Looks like Uber is taking up an entire 23rd floor for a new office at 225 W Randolph (AT&T Building - Randolph & Franklin)- for Uber Freight. There are 21 job openings on their website for this division in Chicago - mostly management level. Average floor plate is 26,500 sq ft. My guess is there's going to be at least 150 people working there if they do fill it out.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1178  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2018, 4:26 AM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,848
^ Probably not the best thing from an innovation point of view having an out of town corporation buying all your start ups. Then again, a lot of these start ups are all about creating enough value short term in order to cash out and sell to a big tech firm... hence why many of them can keep hemorrhaging money yet constantly get new infusions of VC
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1179  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2018, 3:17 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,486
Software company looks to double downtown office space

A fast-growing marketing software company is on a hiring spree and hunting for a lot more office space in the city for the second time in two years as it tries to keep up with its own expansion.

Seven months after drastically boosting its downtown footprint to 52,000 square feet to house a slew of new employees, Chicago-based ActiveCampaign is looking at adding another 100 or more employees by the end of summer and has hired brokerage Cushman & Wakefield to help it expand its downtown office space to about 100,000 square feet, said CEO Jason VandeBoom.

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/reale...n-office-space
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1180  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2018, 5:32 PM
moorhosj moorhosj is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
^ Probably not the best thing from an innovation point of view having an out of town corporation buying all your start ups. Then again, a lot of these start ups are all about creating enough value short term in order to cash out and sell to a big tech firm... hence why many of them can keep hemorrhaging money yet constantly get new infusions of VC
There are two ways to look at it and both are mostly positive. On one hand, you have companies like Fieldglass and Cleversafe where the founders have gone on to invest in lots of other startups and even start new ones. On the other hand, it would be nice for some of these to grow into full IPO'd companies like GrubHub. Both outcomes help the tech ecosystem, but the IPO's might help more with outside perception.

The reality is that companies are flush with cash and those seeking growth are buying up lots and lots of smaller startups.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.