HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 1:35 AM
moorhosj1 moorhosj1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by animositisomina View Post
There is no chance the White Sox are moving to Nashville since the White Sox can't move until after 2030 and Nashville is in line for a new expansion team which could be awarded to them by next year.
No need for absolutes. Multiple cities are going to lose out on expansion. Courting the Sox would be the obvious next move for those cities. Current odds on favorites for new franchise are Nashville, Charlotte, San Antonio, Salt Lake, Orlando, and Portland. No stadium would be ready before 2030 anyways, that actually helps the Sox.

Quote:
Originally Posted by animositisomina View Post
I would argue that Denver was the last MSA that needed an MLB team, and they didn’t get one until 1993 because of the thin air.
Nashville and Charlotte are far bigger today than Denver was in 1993, like 20-50% larger.

Quote:
Originally Posted by animositisomina View Post
The value of the White Sox will certainly go down if they move out of the area.
An MLB that draws 30k a game in a brand new stadium is worth more than one that draws 20k a game in an old stadium.

Quote:
Originally Posted by animositisomina View Post
Ideally, Reinsdorf sells the team to an individual or group who is committed to keeping the franchise in the area, since he clearly can't finance a new stadium. Alternatively, he can find a way to make it work at the location the White Sox have been at for over 120 years.
It has been said over and over by Reinsdorf himself, the team is being sold when he dies. When that happens, it will likely go to the highest bidder regardless of location as his kids don't care about the team or keeping it here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 3:20 AM
animositisomina animositisomina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorhosj1 View Post
No need for absolutes. Multiple cities are going to lose out on expansion. Courting the Sox would be the obvious next move for those cities. Current odds on favorites for new franchise are Nashville, Charlotte, San Antonio, Salt Lake, Orlando, and Portland. No stadium would be ready before 2030 anyways, that actually helps the Sox.
Nashville is a lock for an expansion team. They have a group that is headed by Dave Stewart and MLB very much wants to be there. The White Sox may move, but it won't be to Nashville.

Most of these other cities will be horrible markets for the MLB.

Orlando? Have you paid attention to what has happened in Tampa and Miami? Both markets have proven to be horrible for MLB.

Salt Lake City has an MSA of 1.25 million, which makes it much smaller than the current smallest MSA with an MLB team, Milwaukee.

Charlotte has shown little to no interest in attracting an MLB team, while Portland would be a challenging market given how close it is to Seattle.

San Antonio/Austin are full of transplants and has shown no interest to date in trying to land an MLB team. The recent success of the Rangers and Astros probably means that a lot of the people there who are baseball fans probably support one of those franchises right now.


Quote:
Nashville and Charlotte are far bigger today than Denver was in 1993, like 20-50% larger.

Denver has an isolated MSA which made it far more attractive and viable for MLB since the entire MT could adopt it as their own MLB team. It has proven to be a fantastic market for that very reason. They would have had an MLB team far earlier than 1993 if it wasn't for the thin air.


Quote:
An MLB that draws 30k a game in a brand new stadium is worth more than one that draws 20k a game in an old stadium.
There is no guarantee that any of these markets can attract 30k every night beyond the honeymoon period. Tampa had exactly one year where they averaged over 30,000, and that was 1998. Miami hasn't drawn over 30k since 1994, and they have a brand-new stadium. Arizona hasn't averaged over 30k for a full year since 2008:

https://www.baseball-reference.com/t...D/attend.shtml
https://www.baseball-reference.com/t...A/attend.shtml
https://www.baseball-reference.com/t...I/attend.shtml

I have no idea why you think any of these other markets can consistently draw 30k. What do you base that on? The above are all bigger markets than the ones that you mentioned.

Quote:
It has been said over and over by Reinsdorf himself, the team is being sold when he dies. When that happens, it will likely go to the highest bidder regardless of location as his kids don't care about the team or keeping it here.
I have no doubt that the team will be sold after he dies, but I don't own a crystal ball and can't predict who will buy it, and neither can you. These threats are being made to drum up some kind of support for a publicly financed stadium, and it's failing miserably. He deserves no money, especially since the state paid for the last one. It's not the taxpayer's fault that he built a stadium that became dated the second Camden Yards opened.

It'll be a wonderful day when the White Sox are out of the grips of Reinsdorf and his family, who most certainly can not finance a new stadium on their own. If they leave the market, so be it, but it'll be a very short sighted move that will ultimately diminish the value of the franchise. However, it's most certainly possible for an individual or group with local ties to keep the White Sox in Chicago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 7:58 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,433
Design is moving forward on some of the infrastructure work for The 78, it's not conditioned on the ballpark but that has added some urgency. Taylor St Bridge, St Charles Air Line bridge, etc. Wells-Wentworth is already completed of course, and I believe the design for the Metra relocation and 15th St underpass is done just awaiting funding.

DPI is out for construction bids and we should see an award in May or June and maybe advance work this fall.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 8:19 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Design is moving forward on some of the infrastructure work for The 78, it's not conditioned on the ballpark but that has added some urgency. Taylor St Bridge, St Charles Air Line bridge, etc. Wells-Wentworth is already completed of course, and I believe the design for the Metra relocation and 15th St underpass is done just awaiting funding.

DPI is out for construction bids and we should see an award in May or June and maybe advance work this fall.
This is important background info, for sure. The timing does put the squeeze on the Sox to not pussyfoot and make plans for the 78 if it is to happen. If nothing moves forward by the end of the summer maybe put a fork in the idea?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 12:49 AM
animositisomina animositisomina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 17
Perhaps Jerry reads this forum because he's now offering to chip in $200 million

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/spor...te-sox-stadium

Quote:
In a written statement, a source close to Reinsdorf said that, despite earlier media reports indicating Reinsdorf wants the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority to front the entire $1.25 billion said to be needed for the new ballpark, “We never said there would not be White Sox investment in the potential development.”

“To the contrary,” the statement continued, “We have been looking at several scenarios which would, under the right conditions, involve significant private investment. But as everyone knows, this is an evolving situation, and once we have a clear, definitive path, we will have a clear, definitive commitment.

The statement added, “We are aware of the importance of the overall package, beginning with the incredible benefits a new stadium at The 78 would bring to the city.”

The statement did not define “significant.” But sources close to negotiations say Reinsdorf has mentioned a figure of $200 million or more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 31, 2024, 7:15 PM
James Bond Agent 007's Avatar
James Bond Agent 007 James Bond Agent 007 is offline
Posh
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
Posts: 21,290
Could they put the White Sox in the refurbished 35th St site and move the Cubs to the 78 Site?

/blasphemy
__________________
"There's two kinds of men in the world. Those who have a crush on Linda Ronstadt, and those who never heard of her." - Willie Nelson
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 31, 2024, 7:32 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,081
^ if you wanna go all the way to crazy town, why not build a new stadium for the Sox in.......



Winnetka!
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:44 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.