HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2017, 6:21 PM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidcappi View Post
I would be more comfortable with the city pitching in to the proposed venue at the Main/MacNab church versus this. I might be able to tolerate a land deal but that's about it. In my opinion it should remain in its current location, meaning Copps should be torn down & replaced/renovated
I concur. I think all of jackson should be renovated personally.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
Replaced with a 5,000-10,000 seat arena?


how much is copps ever filled to full capacity out of curiosity?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2017, 10:10 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Bulldogs owner offers marching dollars for new arena

https://www.thespec.com/sports-story...for-new-arena/

The owner of the Hamilton Bulldogs has followed up his public call for the building of a new, smaller arena to replace FirstOntario by saying he'd be willing to personally pay for half of it.

Michael Andlauer had previously said he'd be willing to cover a "substantial" amount for any such project. But pressed for a more-precise figure — tough to do when nobody knows exactly what a rink would cost — he offered the 50-50 proposition.

"If I said I'd match what the city would put in, would that be deemed substantial?" he asked.

Even with that now out there, there's a question about whether city council will be willing to seriously entertain such a discussion.

Andlauer has said he'd like to see a 5,000- to 10,000-seat arena constructed somewhere in town, which he expects would cost between $60 million and $100 million, depending on the bells and whistles attached. He says he understands that relying totally on public money when budgets are tight isn't feasible.

"That's why I'm willing to put money into it," he says. "A lot more than anybody else in this city's ever put into sports."

While suggestions were offered by Ward 7 Coun. Donna Skelly that somewhere on the central Mountain could be an ideal location — the Lime Ridge Mall area was mentioned — Mayor Fred Eisenberger said last week that he believes keeping any new facility in the downtown core would be a priority.

Others might disagree and make the case that removing an arena from the corner of Bay and York and using that prime downtown property for future development would be a better, and more-lucrative, use of city land.

Andlauer says nothing is yet out of the question. In fact, other than saying demographics would have to be taken into account, he took a soft line on possible locations.

"I have had some preliminary talks with the city and I've asked them, 'Here's a clear canvas. You go ahead and paint your canvas,'" he says. "I don't want to dictate where it's going to go. I don't know any better (than others). I think the city councillors who represent all the citizens in the city, they should have their voice and they should know what's in the best interest.

Where it might be built is secondary, however. Eisenberger had previously cited the cost of building a new arena as the central issue in any discussion. Which makes sense since the city is facing a $3-billion-plus infrastructure deficit.

During a radio interview on 900CHML this week, he proposed the idea of private interests — as in, Andlauer by himself or with partners — making a go of this alone. Leaving public money out of it completely would make this a very different discussion, he said.

The owner says putting 100 per cent of the economic load on him might not work. However, he added that a new building would remove city requirements to continually pay for repairs and maintenance (a transformer fire in the arena's hydro room left the entire building in the dark for most of Thursday afternoon). This would potentially mean that once the initial capital investment was made up front, the city would no longer have to subsidize ongoing expenses.

Which all leads to the question of whether the bread crumbs Andlauer has now laid along the path will be enough to lead the issue to the council table for a serious discussion.

"No," says Coun. Sam Merulla. "Not at all. At this point we have nothing to put forward because we can't afford it."

He believes the majority of his council colleagues — who have been through the angry stadium debate and the contentious LRT fight — would share that opinion based on how quickly they dismissed talk of spending over $200 million to bring FirstOntario Centre up to NHL standards (or even modernizing the bottom bowl at a cost of close to $70 million) as suggested in a consultant's report. And how disinterested they were in entertaining the idea of hosting the 2030 Commonwealth Games.

Skelly, on the other hand, says they shouldn't be so quick to throw it aside.

"I believe it would be irresponsible not to engage in that discussion," she says.

Something has to be done with the arena eventually, she says.

On that radio show this week, Eisenberger agreed — with the first part of that sentiment, anyway.

"Sooner or later we're going to have to deal with this issue," he said. "Because it is aging."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2017, 11:30 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
They should speak to McMaster University, I know McMaster explored the idea of a hockey arena for the Marauders. I also know David Braley was willing to donate millions towards an arena, however the idea just faded away as they focused more towards the stadium.

Let's say it's $100 million than $50 million from Andlauer, $25 million both from McMaster and the City. Could probably bring the price tag down if we got donations from Braley or even Joyce.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2017, 1:55 AM
bigguy1231 bigguy1231 is offline
Concerned Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,348
The problem with private interests building an arena is that they would have to pay property taxes on it. That's why most owners are willing to contribute but would rather the city own the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2017, 3:46 AM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigguy1231 View Post
The problem with private interests building an arena is that they would have to pay property taxes on it. That's why most owners are willing to contribute but would rather the city own the building.
Mm. Good point!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2017, 1:42 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Merulla's dream: ‘This could be a billion-dollar development’
(Hamilton SPectator, Scott Radley, Nov 23 2017)

A city councillor says he has a billion-dollar idea for anyone willing to build a new arena, convention centre and concert hall in the downtown with their own money.

Coun. Sam Merulla says the city should consider transferring ownership of the FirstOntario Centre, the Hamilton Convention Centre and FirstOntario Concert Hall properties to a developer in exchange for the construction of privately built new facilities.

Once those essentials were looked after, that developer — or consortium of developers — could add lucrative residential and commercial facets to the plan as they wished.

"This could be a billion-dollar development," Merulla says.

The Ward 4 councillor will be introducing a notice of motion to that effect at Friday's general issues committee meeting.

This is the latest manoeuvre in a story that came to life a couple of weeks ago when Hamilton Bulldogs owner Michael Andlauer said the city should be exploring the construction of a new 5,000-10,000-seat arena which would likely cost between $60 million and $100 million. At the time he said he would match whatever the city put toward the project.

Those comments didn't initially get much official traction. But on Monday, council heard immediate repairs or upgrades costing more than $6 million are recommended for the convention centre and arena. The city's annual budget for such repairs is $800,000. Millions more will eventually be needed for less-urgent repairs to the city's three aging entertainment venues.

In the wake of that, Merulla crafted his motion that could leave Hamilton with a new rink and a new convention centre at no monetary cost to taxpayers. It might also bring the downtown a highrise condo development and commercial options that would provide significant tax revenue to the city.

"This is a win beyond comprehension for the taxpayers," he says. "There's no downside."

If this concept sounds somewhat similar to the gist of a consultant's report suggesting a private arena-convention centre development in the core that was essentially pushed aside by council almost as soon as it was submitted to the city back in March, Merulla doesn't disagree. Though the residential and commercial components are now new.

What's clearly changed today is the urgency to do something in light of the necessary repairs to the existing buildings that will cost the city millions. With millions more possibly being required down the road.

And while the billion-dollar figure might be slightly hyperbolic — even Merulla acknowledges it might not be quite that high — there's no doubt this would be a massive development that would likely be bigger than anything else in the city short of the LRT.

His plan appears to have some support around the council table, at least as an idea to explore.


Read it in full here.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2017, 2:42 PM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,237
*forks out a billion dollars*

Oh right, I don't have a billion dollars, nor do most people...

Quote:
Originally Posted by NortheastWind View Post
Thanks for being honest.

No problem
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2017, 7:27 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,800
I'd be a fan of an arena at Mac if it wasn't downtown. It helps that the LRT terminal will also be there. An arena near Eastgate would also work for the same reason. One up the mountain sounds absolutely silly though.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2017, 9:26 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt602 View Post
I'd be a fan of an arena at Mac if it wasn't downtown. It helps that the LRT terminal will also be there. An arena near Eastgate would also work for the same reason. One up the mountain sounds absolutely silly though.
I personally think the Tim Hortons stadium would have been best suited for the Innovation park areaish. Around where the LRT garage will be. Tons of room, on the LRT route, and close to the highway. Having big even spaces like Copps in the downtown like the ACC brings tourists and outsiders to the centre of the city. Tourists force the city to ensure the downtown is safe and well lit as outsiders will be more judgemental.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2017, 4:56 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Millions in repairs needed for Convention Centre, FirstOntario Centre
(Hamilton Spectator, Matthew Van Dongen, Nov 21 2017)

The city needs to find at least $2 million to fix the crumbling exterior of the Hamilton Convention Centre to avoid the future possibility of bricks falling on people below.

That capital funding request is just a fraction of nearly $7 million in convention centre repairs deemed to need "immediate action" this year or next - as well as another $4 million to replace failing escalators and elevators in the FirstOntario Centre.

A study of the convention centre brick earlier this year discovered loose or crumbling brick at various locations around the 35-year-old building, spurring immediate brick removal and repairs as well as unspecified "adjustments" to exit locations to ensure public safety, a new report says.

But more work is needed, soon.

"It is suggested that spalling brick faces will pose a safety hazard in the future, if not further addressed," say staff in the report, which note weakened areas of brick will worsen during freeze-thaw cycles.

The report asks council to approve $2 million as a priority in next year's capital budget. It also notes a study of the entire building has found $6.7 million in repairs that deserve "immediate action," but notes acknowledges the challenge of competing budget requests - including a separate and urgent $4 million for FirstOntario Centre.

The information comes in two separate reports headed to a city budget meeting Friday outline a combined $45 million in required - but unfunded - repairs to the city's three aging entertainment facilities in the core, which also includes Hamilton Place.

The $4 million request for the former Copps Coliseum would cover replacing four failing escalators, installing a new elevator and "modernization" of two existing elevators.


Read it in full here.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2017, 5:06 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
I'd like to see Copps turned into an exhibition complex, the new convention centre. A new arena at the city owned land at Stuart/Tiffany area.

Sell the convention centre building and probably get a few millions, use the money towards the arena. Would make a great spot for retail and condos being right next to the HSR transit terminal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2017, 6:52 PM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelTown View Post
I'd like to see Copps turned into an exhibition complex, the new convention centre. A new arena at the city owned land at Stuart/Tiffany area.

Sell the convention centre building and probably get a few millions, use the money towards the arena. Would make a great spot for retail and condos being right next to the HSR transit terminal.
I think the whole upper layer of jackson should be redone as an entertainment complex - that area is so underutilized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 2:06 AM
anactualalien anactualalien is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 156
Quote:
Sell the convention centre building and probably get a few millions, use the money towards the arena. Would make a great spot for retail and condos being right next to the HSR transit terminal.
A change like that would benefit King St in that area at street level so much. Wonder if moving the government office space above elsewhere something we'd ever likely see though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 3:12 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,397
Interesting idea re: re-purposing the arena as a convention centre. I'm envisioning something like what was done with Maple Leaf Gardens... take out the lower seats and use that whole level as exhibition space, as some of the seating is movable now for that purpose (or keep some sections of seating for theatre-style rooms), build a new floor for the top level, and unlike MLG clear out the entire upper level seating for a larger exhibit hall. It would probably take significant renos to make it work though, demolishing the upper grandstands to allow for more volume, and bringing in some natural light either through big new windows in the walls or a roof with skylights.

The current convention centre though... how is Carmen's doing running that show? Are they getting lots of smaller business and events in there? It might be fine left as-is, with whatever refurbishments are needed to the building itself.

Of course, this is all predicated on the city having the funds to make it happen, as well as invest in 1/2+ of a new arena. I'd say it will be 10-20 years before this might even be feasible, if the city's economic trajectory continues to head upward.

Copps/FOC has also allowed many, many large events to be hosted in the city. I agree with the argument that it's too big for lower tier hockey, but that capacity is a wonderful thing to have when a big concert tour or sports event comes to town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 3:20 AM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
The current convention centre though... how is Carmen's doing running that show? Are they getting lots of smaller business and events in there? It might be fine left as-is, with whatever refurbishments are needed to the building itself.
Carmens does pretty damn well in all honesty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 2:55 PM
NortheastWind NortheastWind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronamut View Post
Carmens does pretty damn well in all honesty.
Thanks for being honest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 1:12 PM
BCTed BCTed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,299
Two Canada Cup finals, multiple NHL regular season games, multiple NBA regular season games, several games with the US Dream Team II for the FIBA World Championships, a U2 concert, multiple Springsteen concerts, multiple Grateful Dead concerts, multiple big wresting pay-per-view events (including the first-ever Royal Rumble), multiple Garth Brooks concerts, many flavour-of-the-day pop concerts (New Kids On The Block at their peak, Britney Spears at her peak), Paul McCartney, and many others are examples of events that would very likely not have taken place without an arena the size of Copps Coliseum.

A ton of events that could have been held at a smaller arena sold out at Copps (at least one game in the World Junior hocky championships, the Memorial Cup final, one of the Calder Cup finals games, an Arkells concert, a bunch of Tragically Hip concerts, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera).

It is a bit unfortunate that the Bulldogs do not have a more appropriately sized arena to play in, but they are not the only lower-tier team to play in an outsized arena. And to be honest, I don't think the city should be making major infrastructure decisions simply to right-size to a team that may not be a permanent fixture in the city, no matter how dedicated and civic-minded the owner may be.

If Hamilton were to downgrade to a smaller main arena, it would also be downgrading itself to much smaller-city status in my opinion. Heck, Prince George, BC has a total of about 75,000 people and has a 6000-person arena. Should Hamilton be building one of comparable size?

Also, (and this is admittedly an impractical thought that doesn't on its own warrant a spend of hundreds of millions of dollars) there is something actually ambitious about always holding open the possibility of having an NHL team come to Hamilton. Yes, it does seem about as far from being a reality as ever at this particular moment in time, but the world can change very quickly and I like the idea of keeping the door open.

Last edited by BCTed; Nov 22, 2017 at 1:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 3:00 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
The Bulldogs represent a substantial chunk of the event calendar for that facility — as an AHL franchise, they were playing around 40 dates a year, and as an OHL franchise, 34 dates a year, plus training camp and practice days. (The coliseum was seeing between 83 and 91 event days annually in 2007-2010, and that has dipped to around 72 this year.) But the Bulldogs are only signing three-year leases that are sufficiently vague to allow for any tier of hockey. Globe & Mail, Jan 26 2015:

Quote:
Andlauer's lease at Copps, since renamed FirstOntario Centre, calls for him to provide a hockey team as a tenant, without specifying it must be an AHL team.
That's the kind of long-term commitment we're talking about, and despite the club's familiar brand, essentially the extent of their practical leverage — and it’s offset by the fact that the facility would have, let’s say, an additional 50 dates a year in which to book events.

Building a $100M arena, even with Andlauer's promised capital cost sharing, would require Council to commit something close to what they coughed up for the Ticats. Except they won't be able to drain the Future Fund, but will have to ask taxpayers to foot the bill directly, and explain that this new facility will competing for bookings with other City-owned facilities, which would require ongoing operational subsidies. CBC Hamilton, Jan 27 2014:

Quote:
Once Global Spectrum breaks even on management costs, it shares any further profits with the city, which could happen as soon as 2015. The ratio is 70:30 in favour of the city.

In 2013, the city subsidized Copps Coliseum, Hamilton Place and the Hamilton Convention Centre to the tune of $2.85 million. In 2014, the subsidy will be $1.79 million, said finance head Mike Zegarac.
On top of which, Global Spectrum is partnered with Live Nation, who would presumably have no incentive to book shows at a competing venue in-market if it could be avoided.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan

Last edited by thistleclub; Nov 22, 2017 at 3:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2017, 3:10 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
I wonder if any highrises associated with the project would be limited by the escarpment in height. I'm guessing no.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2017, 11:48 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
City will spend millions to fix arena, convention centre
https://www.thespec.com/news-story/7...ention-centre/

The city will make badly needed repairs to its downtown arena and convention centre while exploring the potential for wholesale private redevelopment of the precinct.

Councillors voted Friday to spend $4.3 million replacing broken escalators and small inaccessible elevators at the FirstOntario Centre next year. Another $2 million will go to prevent falling brick hazards outside the Hamilton Convention Centre.

But budget committee members also approved a motion from Coun. Sam Merulla that asks staff to report on possible redevelopment or sale scenarios for all three city-owned core entertainment facilities, including the arena, convention centre and concert hall.

"If we're successful, this could create an entire residential, commercial and entertainment precinct," he said.

A privately funded consulting report pitching a $68-million renovation or complete $250-million rebuild of the former Copps Coliseum was received coolly by councillors and set aside earlier this year.

The problem with that pitch, Merulla argued, was the city was asked "for money it doesn't have." His motion asked staff to investigate legally feasible methods of redeveloping the aging block "with the land as the city's contribution."

Mayor Fred Eisenberger applauded the idea of a long-term look at the "entire precinct."

He suggested the possibility of an eventual request for proposal that would "appeal to development interests looking for a big play."

But he also stressed the importance of making immediate investments in the buildings to keep them "safe and functional." Normally, the city has only spent about $800,000 in capital repairs each year for all three core entertainment buildings combined.

Including the new entertainment facilities cash, councillors voted to approve a $236-million capital budget for 2018. The spending equates to a $30 hike on the average homeowner's tax bill. The final tax hike won't be determined until the operating budget is set in the new year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:56 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.