HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5181  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2017, 3:22 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
Haven't seen what they changed in the renos but Observation Deck has been there at least two seasons now, maybe more.
It has - but it's much more interconnected to the concourse now, and the layout is a bit changed. They took out a bunch of walls between columns to basically completely open that part of the concourse.

It's much more of a public bar similar to the other ones at the southeast and southwest corner of the upper deck concourse.

The relocation of the upper deck concourse Tim Hortons is a bit clumsy though. Take the slowest serving and most popular concession, move it to a location 1/4 of it's original size, and yeah - gridlock. Right outside my section too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5182  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2017, 3:26 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ It used to be easy to get Tim's at MTS Centre but TNSE seems to be downplaying it now. Trying to steer fans to $10 beers and $5 soft drinks?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5183  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2017, 3:28 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ It used to be easy to get Tim's at MTS Centre but TNSE seems to be downplaying it now. Trying to steer fans to $10 beers and $5 soft drinks?
Yep. They did basically change it from a full service Tims to just a coffee and timbit location now though. But still - slow.

Minor grips about the Tims aside - the concourses are downright fancy now - dare I say "Big League"...?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5184  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2017, 3:36 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
Haven't seen what they changed in the renos but Observation Deck has been there at least two seasons now, maybe more.
It was nowhere near an actual bar. It was a portable bar with limited selection and some tables, generally closed early as well. They have now built a permanent, full-service bar similar to the ones they built in the corners of the 300s when they expanded the concourse. They also either added a (or moved the) 300-level Jets Gear there, on top of the existing atrium one - so it should do a lot to bring more people out there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Yep. They did basically change it from a full service Tims to just a coffee and timbit location now though. But still - slow.

Minor grips about the Tims aside - the concourses are downright fancy now - dare I say "Big League"...?
They used to add Tims coffee to some concessions once winter was in full swing. Sure they will again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5185  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2017, 4:35 PM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ It used to be easy to get Tim's at MTS Centre but TNSE seems to be downplaying it now. Trying to steer fans to $10 beers and $5 soft drinks?
didnt they add a few more tims locations now though?
__________________
I don't want to hear your opinions on facts
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5186  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2017, 5:45 PM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 3,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
didnt they add a few more tims locations now though?
Tim's coffee will be available at multiple locations
__________________
just an ordinary Prairie Boy who loves to be in the loop on what is going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5187  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2017, 7:51 PM
Jets4Life Jets4Life is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: True North
Posts: 1,913
Who won and how did the Jets look?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5188  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2017, 7:53 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jets4Life View Post
Who won and how did the Jets look?
Minnesota. 3-2 SO.

The game was a bit choppy because it was basically penalty after penalty. For both teams. It was a bit ridiculous.

Jets probably should have won, but we got out-goalied.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5189  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2017, 2:09 AM
DLLB DLLB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Penticton, BC
Posts: 2,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Minnesota. 3-2 SO.

Jets probably should have won, but we got out-goalied.
A far too common theme
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5190  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2017, 2:20 AM
Jets4Life Jets4Life is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: True North
Posts: 1,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLLB View Post
A far too common theme
Helle's saving percentage was 0.944% so he could not have played to bad.

I've heard Poolman was getting rave reviews, considering it was his first NHL action, and is expected to be a third pairing defensemen. Sadly, Logan Stanley was said to look pretty out of place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5191  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2017, 4:33 AM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,803
Poolman looked fantastic – definitely the most NHL ready of all the young guys. He could be this season's Morrissey in terms of breakout star. Scheifele and Perrault also looked great.

Hellebuyck played really well, looked very solid - Minni's goalie was just out-of-this-world though. And he was the backup in Iowa last year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5192  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2017, 12:28 PM
Jets4Life Jets4Life is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: True North
Posts: 1,913
Well the Jets are 0-2. Maurice is coaching so it should be another year of not making the playoffs.

At least Poolman looks impressive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5193  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2017, 11:12 PM
DavefromSt.Vital DavefromSt.Vital is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Yonge and Davisville
Posts: 696
For those with tons of Marriott/Starwood points, two seats in the Starwood box for Jets vs. Kings at the Staples Center for 25,000 Starpoints:

https://auction.starwoodhotels.com/redeem/moment/4984

While the Jets vs. Rangers game at MSG hasn't posted yet, two seats in the Starwood box at MSG for other games are now at 55,000 Starpoints (!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5194  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2017, 1:28 AM
DLLB DLLB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Penticton, BC
Posts: 2,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jets4Life View Post
Well the Jets are 0-2. Maurice is coaching so it should be another year of not making the playoffs.

At least Poolman looks impressive.
Nothing will change until they get rid of him. His record speaks for itself.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5195  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2017, 3:17 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,235
It's pre-season. Jets team is essentially determined. There's nor reason and no motivations for the top guys to go all out.

I found the game last night more interesting than the first two simply for that reason. All the guys out there are fighting for a couple NHL spots.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5196  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2017, 3:21 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,803
Yeah you can literally never gather anything from pre-season. It means absolutely nothing... it's just tryouts for the bottom roster spots, at best.

I agree Poolman looks great, he'll definitely be in the minors though. Only would get called up likely if we lose 2 D-men.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5197  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2017, 9:00 AM
chrisallard5454's Avatar
chrisallard5454 chrisallard5454 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Funny @Jets4Life,

I distinctly remember you trying to discredit any knowledge I had as both a general hockey fan and someone who understands player depth (defensemen in particular) for being hot on Poolman earlier this year. You basically shot down my ideas as ludicrous. Turns out I was pretty on the money, at least with Poolman's development as a player. Funny considering my excitement and belief in his abilities as a great prospect was shot down due to being someone who knew nothing about hockey...
__________________
2017 Tryout for DEL 2 Kassel Huskies
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5198  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2017, 10:48 AM
Jets4Life Jets4Life is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: True North
Posts: 1,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisallard5454 View Post
Funny @Jets4Life,

I distinctly remember you trying to discredit any knowledge I had as both a general hockey fan and someone who understands player depth (defensemen in particular) for being hot on Poolman earlier this year. You basically shot down my ideas as ludicrous. Turns out I was pretty on the money, at least with Poolman's development as a player. Funny considering my excitement and belief in his abilities as a great prospect was shot down due to being someone who knew nothing about hockey...
You come in here just to post about something I supposedly said to you perhaps a year ago just to start a fight?

1. Can you provide the exact quote I said since I have no recollection of this.

2. You are really something for bringing up an argument that happened half a year ago. Get over yourself.

*edit...i found the post you were inferring to. I will paste it later. You claim:

1. Poolman will be a top 4 defenseman (highly unlikely)
2. Enstrom is garbage and should be off the Jets (I disagree)
3. Logan Stanley is a beast and going to be one of our top defenseman in future (no chance)

I never said Poolman was not a good prospect. I said Poolman will probably be a RHD slightly better than Postma, but not as good as Myers, Byfuglien, and Trouba. You were hyping him up to be the next best thing, when in reality he will be a bottom pairing d-man.

In terms of the left side, Morrissey, Kulikov, Enstrom will be in our top 6. Poolman will most likely either be the 7th d-man or sent down to the AHL at the start of the year. I like Poolman but I'm still uncertain he will crack the roster other than press box or replacing an injured player.

I'm far more confident that Niku, who happens to be 4 years younger than Poolman, will crack the regular lineup after a season of adjustment in the AHL. As for you declaring Stanley a "beast" and our future star LHD, I think you are full of hot air, as referring to yourself as bragging that you are an expert at judging defensemen. Stanley's a bust and will be lucky to ever make it on the Jets lineup. Valabik II.

Last edited by Jets4Life; Sep 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5199  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2017, 12:06 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jets4Life View Post
You come in here just to post about something I supposedly said to you perhaps a year ago just to start a fight?

1. Can you provide the exact quote I said since I have no recollection of this.

2. You are really something for bringing up an argument that happened half a year ago. Get over yourself.

*edit...i found the post you were inferring to. I will paste it later. You claim:

1. Poolman will be a top 4 defenseman (highly unlikely)
2. Enstrom is garbage and should be off the Jets (I disagree)
3. Logan Stanley is a beast and going to be one of our top defenseman in future (no chance)

I never said Poolman was not a good prospect. I said Poolman will probably be a RHD slightly better than Postma, but not as good as Myers, Byfuglien, and Trouba. You were hyping him up to be the next best thing, when in reality he will be a bottom pairing d-man.

In terms of the left side, Morrissey, Kulikov, Enstrom will be in our top 6. Poolman will most likely either be the 7th d-man or sent down to the AHL at the start of the year. I like Poolman but I'm still uncertain he will crack the roster other than press box or replacing an injured player.

I'm far more confident that Niku, who happens to be 4 years younger than Poolman, will crack the regular lineup after a season of adjustment in the AHL. As for you declaring Stanley a "beast" and our future star LHD, I think you are full of hot air, as referring to yourself as bragging that you are an expert at judging defensemen. Stanley's a bust and will be lucky to ever make it on the Jets lineup. Valabik II.
Ok but Stanley is still only like 19 and defensemen have a tendency to be late bloomers. Just look at Morrissey. He looked like a bust them came in and became one of more reliable shutdown guys.

No faith in the draft. We wouldn't have traded up to get him if there wasn't a very good reason for doing so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5200  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2017, 2:06 PM
Jets4Life Jets4Life is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: True North
Posts: 1,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
Ok but Stanley is still only like 19 and defensemen have a tendency to be late bloomers.
That's a myth. Just look at Troubas development as an example.

Quote:
We wouldn't have traded up to get him if there wasn't a very good reason for doing so.
The Jets scouts saw something in Stanley that others didn't. The draft is hit and miss sometimes. In retrospect it was a bad move.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:29 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.