HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2010, 6:17 AM
Web Web is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 523
a ton of rAilroad ties and rails have been taken up over the years near raley field......all thats left is the railyard yard there and the track down jefferson to port of sac and all the business down there.....much of which is weed infested but there still is somethin on the end of the line past the PO......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2010, 4:19 PM
kamehameha kamehameha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 207
Friday, September 3, 2010
West Sacramento makes play for high-rise riverfront hotel

West Sacramento is betting on a hotel rebound with its latest proposal for a publicly owned, high-rise hotel along the riverfront.

After buying 4.6 acres south of the Ziggurat building last month, the city is now under a tight schedule to strike a deal with developer Parkcrest Development Corp., which walked away from a hotel proposal for Sacramento’s K Street last year.

One reason for the rush is the project’s financial backer, a large South Korean fund, is looking to invest sooner rather than later. And the city is aiming to complete a bond sale to fund construction by the end of the year. That means it needs a development agreement and a guaranteed maximum price from a contractor well before then.

The pressure has some city officials feeling guarded.

“I’m cautious because there’s not a lot of these projects happening right now,” said City Councilman Mark Johannessen, adding that the final terms of the deal will dictate whether he’ll give his approval. “The question in my mind is, how can we do it here? It could be a good proposal, but I’m ready to pull the plug if things go sideways.”

City officials said this week that the investment fund Consus Asset Management Co. Ltd., which has been described as South Korea’s version of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, has committed to purchasing $100 million in federally backed bonds that will be used to build the hotel. No drawings have been released publicly, and officials aren’t sure how many stories it will be. It is expected to be 300 rooms and up to 16 stories, with 20,000 square feet of meeting space.

“We’ve done a lot of due diligence,” said Tina Gontarski, West Sacramento’s community development director.

More business by 2013?
The hotel market has struggled the past two years, though it appears to have stabilized. Colliers PKF Consulting in San Francisco reported that Sacramento hotels were busier in June than they were a year ago; during that time, occupancy increased to 66 percent from 63.2 percent. The region’s average daily room rate was lower, however, at $91.20 in June, down from $95.69 a year ago.

PKF performed a confidential study for West Sacramento indicating the hotel market will be healthier when the hotel is expected to open in 2013, said Paul Blumberg, public finance manager for the city.

“Last year was a horrible year for hospitality in Sacramento,” Blumberg said. “Our market study shows occupancy is coming up.”

Blumberg said there’s also an urgency to capitalize on low construction costs before prices for steel and other materials begin rising.

Sources said the city is negotiating with Marriott Hotels to be the operator, but none of the parties would confirm the information. That deal would make sense given that Sacramento already has full-service Hyatt and Sheraton hotels.

Architecture firm Cooper Carry of Atlanta is working on designs, and the general contractor is Hensel Phelps Construction Co. Parkcrest has built mid-rise hotels from Rancho Cucamonga to Portland, Ore. While it does not have experience building high-rises, the architect and contractor do, Blumberg said.

The proposal is to use Build America Bonds, a stimulus package creation offered to encourage development during the recession, to fund the construction. The federal government guarantees the bonds and pays a portion of the interest. If the hotel is built, the city’s finance authority would own it, similar to the formerly city-owned Sheraton Grand in downtown Sacramento.

The K Street question
The lingering question for some is why the development team and Consus withdrew their larger hotel proposal on K Street. Parkcrest Development’s principals met with West Sacramento officials about the new venture just weeks after withdrawing from the K Street proposal.

Leslie Fritzsche, Sacramento’s downtown development manager, said there were indications that all the financing was not in order.

But Robert Leach, who developed the boutique Le Rivage Hotel on the Sacramento riverfront and now works for Parkcrest, said the Sacramento deal fizzled because there wasn’t the same sense of urgency from city officials and they were ambivalent about a hotel at the K Street location. The K Street project also meant dealing with historic preservation and parking issues, whereas West Sacramento represented a “clean slate,” he said.

“The proof will be in the pudding,” he said. “If three years from now you see a beautiful hotel on the river, it will be pretty clear who dropped the ball on K Street.”

Sung-Min Park, director of project management for Parkcrest, declined to comment, citing a confidentiality agreement with West Sacramento.

Other developers are watching the deal.

“I’ve got great faith in our city council and staff,” said Dan Ramos, whose family has been developing real estate in the city for years and owns property nearby. “If they realize this is not the deal they think it is, then they will unravel it.”

The idea for a city-owned riverfront hotel stems back to 2007, and the city sought to sell as much as $250 million in bonds to finance it. Panattoni Development had an option on the land, but it expired last year without a hotel deal.

“In essence, it’s a great site and a great concept,” Ramos said. “It’s real important you choose the right partner.”



mshaw@bizjournals.com | 916-558-7861



Read more: West Sacramento makes play for high-rise riverfront hotel - Sacramento Business Journal
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2010, 7:43 PM
kamehameha kamehameha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 207
Bond issuance for the riverfront luxury hotel is this December and immediately after that, they will start construction. This project will move forward at lightning speed. The first vertical construction for the bridge district will start early 2011. Bridge housing will build a five storey affordable housing.

Last edited by kamehameha; Sep 7, 2010 at 8:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2010, 5:00 PM
kamehameha kamehameha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 207

Last edited by kamehameha; Sep 11, 2010 at 5:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2010, 5:21 PM
KingsFan#1's Avatar
KingsFan#1 KingsFan#1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 61
Uh, your picture is not showing up, is there a link we could click?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2010, 5:29 PM
kamehameha kamehameha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 207
Cant get it to work. West Sac is about to start construction on another project. The long awaited extension of the river walk complete with a pier and a wide riverfront plaza. The riverfront promenade will extend from the tower bridge to the pioneer bridge. Construction contract will be awarded this wednesday to Parker Landscaping development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2010, 6:33 PM
ThatDarnSacramentan ThatDarnSacramentan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,064
I see. That's unfortunate to me, actually. I like the Detroit-esque abandoned industrial, concrete and nature riverfront that's there now. Really makes for a stark contrast when shooting Wells Fargo and Capital Mall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2010, 6:42 PM
kamehameha kamehameha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 207
This is all going to change now. We will have a west sacramento riverbank that will resemble waikiki or chicago in a few years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2010, 10:53 PM
ThatDarnSacramentan ThatDarnSacramentan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,064
Hah, no offense, but the day the Sacramento River looks like the Chicago River is the day a chihuahua gets elected President.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2010, 4:16 AM
KingsFan#1's Avatar
KingsFan#1 KingsFan#1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 61
Did anyone notice the big Demarcus Cousins banner on CalSTRS? I went to kings on L and people were talking about how it was the first time there have been tinted banners on a building in Sac
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2010, 4:36 AM
Pistola916 Pistola916 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SAN FRANCISCO/SACRAMENTO
Posts: 634
^
Back when the Kings were good there was a huge banner hanging over the Ziggurat.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2010, 5:32 PM
KingsFan#1's Avatar
KingsFan#1 KingsFan#1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 61
I meant on the side of a large glass wall, that's why I said tinted, because it looks like the glass is painted, even though it's really not
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #273  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2010, 3:37 AM
Dieler Dieler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 88
[QUOTE=kamehameha;4969574]Friday, September 3, 2010
West Sacramento makes play for high-rise riverfront hotel

Hey Kamehameha: You seem pretty knowledgeable about what is happening in West Sacramento. Is something cooking in WSac with the Kings? Are they in play with a behind the scenes arena proposal in case the convergence plan doesn't work out?

Maybe a crazy idea, but I've seen a few signs lately that point me to the thought. Any insight?

Aloha!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #274  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2010, 6:01 PM
kamehameha kamehameha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 207
No such proposal in existence. About 5 years ago there was a front page article on the Sacbee mentioning the triangle area(bridge district) next to the Raley field as one of the possibilities for a new Kings Arena along with Natomas and the Railyard. You need a new Sacramento river bridge before you can start thinking about a project of this magnitude.

Last edited by kamehameha; Sep 16, 2010 at 6:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2010, 3:45 PM
kamehameha kamehameha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 207
Friday, September 17, 2010
‘Open palette’ for developers in West Sac Bridge DistrictSacramento Business Journal - by Michael Shaw Staff writer
West Sacramento developers revealed a rather abstract view of the Bridge District this week.

When West Sacramento officials break ground Monday on the massive redevelopment project known as the Bridge District, the renderings, elevations, watercolors and digital designs so familiar to large urban renewal projects will be noticeably absent.

In their place is an illustration with oversized cartoon characters more akin to a New Yorker magazine cover than something from a planner’s desktop. The abstract vision for the new riverfront comes by design — unlike others across the river in Sacramento, there is no master developer on this project.

Instead, there are 19 property owners with 97 acres of developable land, and most don’t have a clear idea what they will build.

“Each project will help everyone else, but we will also compete with each other,” said Gregg Herrington, director of development for Yackzan Group of Davis. “For any one artist or architect to present a district-wide vision is impossible.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2010, 4:23 PM
kamehameha kamehameha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 207
Marcos Breton: West Sac shows big neighbor how it's done


By Marcos Breton
mbreton@sacbee.com The Sacramento Bee
Published: Sunday, Sep. 12, 2010 - 12:00 am | Page 1B
Separated by a river yet connected by bridges, Sacramento and West Sacramento could not be more different.

One city has a can-do spirit. Its leaders are cohesive and share the same goal – making their city better.

The other city has a can't-do complex. Its leaders are fractured and divided. Can you guess which city is which?

Here is a hint: Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson wasted a year on a failed "strong mayor" campaign to strengthen his governing powers. West Sacramento Mayor Christopher Cabaldon simply wants to be a good mayor.

Johnson spends many weekends in Washington, D.C., campaigning for D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty because Johnson's fiancée – Michelle Rhee, head of D.C. schools – will lose her job if Fenty loses his election.

Cabaldon spends many weekends schmoozing with his constituents and playing "Rock Band" with voters.

He has partners on his City Council. Johnson has antagonists on his.

Sacramento has a 240- acre dream of an energized urban core rising from the dust of an abandoned, downtown railyard. But the project is nearing foreclosure.

West Sacramento has a 188-acre dream of an energized urban core along its riverfront. That project is moving forward quietly and effectively.

To develop the downtown railyard, Sacramento is in partnership with a Georgia-based developer who is stretched with projects across the globe and is fighting it out with his Illinois lender.

To develop its waterfront, West Sacramento is in partnership with five property owners who are based here, make their money here and have deep roots here.

With each passing day, West Sacramento seems to shed its inferiority complex. With each passing day, Sacramento grows more negative.

It's not happenstance. Individuals and partnerships are the difference between West Sacramento's go-go spirit and Sacramento's no-no attitude.

Yes, Sacramento has a population of more than 480,000 to West Sacramento's 48,000 or so. And yes, West Sacramento was so riddled with crime and poverty, that even modest development would look great.

But the contrasts here should not be dismissed. West Sacramento is moving forward because it's not burdened by divisive Sacramento politics.

Unions run Sacramento but aren't a factor in West Sacramento.

Consequently, you don't see West Sac council members grandstanding for labor sugar daddies. You don't see council members trying to stick it to Cabaldon in the way some of Johnson's colleagues stick it to him.

Moreover, West Sacramento officials are unafraid of taking steps that would draw howls of protest in Sacramento. Jeff Reisig, Yolo County district attorney, proves this every day by pushing a stringent injunction against West Sacramento gang members – complete with curfews and prohibitions against gathering in public.

The injunction is being challenged in court, including by some notable Sacramento lawyers.

West Sac residents I've met feel safer because of the injunction. The activists who most hate it mostly live in Sacramento.

Meanwhile, on Sept. 20, West Sac will break ground for its riverfront expansion. It actually already broke ground, but the ceremony had to wait while some tree huggers screamed about a butternut tree in the path of progress.

Despite a lawsuit, West Sacramento was not deterred. And it turns out the tree wasn't a butternut after all, Cabaldon said.

A few trees had grown into each other – fused together. The whole mess was a lot of noise over nothing.

Instead of being derailed, the developers of the Bridge District remained patient. One is Mark Friedman, whose family runs the Arden Fair mall.

In contrast to Sacramento projects, Friedman has not trotted out fancy drawings to tout his development. They've moved slowly, deliberately.

He and other partners will eventually develop 730 homes near the Tower Bridge. The residences will be "green." The grounds will promote community by including gardens for neighbors to share.

The infrastructure for the Bridge District will be done at the end of 2011.

That the project is going forward at all is an act of faith in dark economic times. It's a stunning contrast to the stalled railyard project in Sacramento.

"All of us see our project as our legacy," Friedman said.

You wonder what type of legacy awaits certain "leaders" of Sacramento.
.

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/09/12/302...#ixzz0znwR25ww
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2010, 5:43 PM
Mr. Ozo Mr. Ozo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 164
The fact that there is no master plan is the best part, because it means there will be a diversity of different projects and ideas.

There is potential for this to be like the "Pearl District" in Portland. There isn't a lot of wow factor for visiters it's just an actual functioning urban neighborhood where familes actually live. As opposed the "Urban Dinseyland" model some other cites try to achieve.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2010, 10:03 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,408
There's no master developer, but that doesn't mean there is no master plan. Without a master plan for transportation, water, sewer and other infrastructure, that "diverse" appearance can mean a mess at the ground level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2010, 4:28 AM
urbanadvocate urbanadvocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ozo View Post
The fact that there is no master plan is the best part, because it means there will be a diversity of different projects and ideas.

There is potential for this to be like the "Pearl District" in Portland. There isn't a lot of wow factor for visiters it's just an actual functioning urban neighborhood where familes actually live. As opposed the "Urban Dinseyland" model some other cites try to achieve.


ummm what? the pearl district is totally planned out. everything about portland's downtown is carefully planned and the city has abided by the same general overall masterplan for a long time. but yes id love to see an urban neighborhood that has actual families living in it--its one of the things i really hate about sf and love about pdx.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2010, 6:30 PM
CAGeoNerd CAGeoNerd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 355
Go West Sac! At least someone around these parts can get a vision for the future and act on it. I love that there is a short date to get the infrastructure in place and pretty much just have to get the buildings put in. I'm hoping this new hotel they are putting in near the Ziggaraut is a decent size high-rise and something with character to anchor that area with the Calsters building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.