HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 3:13 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,786
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 4:39 PM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,474
I no longer doubt that this is going to be a spectacular building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 5:20 PM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Genral View Post
I no longer doubt that this is going to be a spectacular building.
For me, aesthetically it really depends on how the upper-section of the building meshes with the lower-section. I have yet to fall in love with the setback of the upper-section, which to me makes it feel disjointed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 8:11 PM
WestAustinite's Avatar
WestAustinite WestAustinite is offline
Old West Austin
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Genral View Post
I no longer doubt that this is going to be a spectacular building.
I do. I think it depends if they taper that upper section.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 8:47 PM
resansom resansom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestAustinite View Post
I do. I think it depends if they taper that upper section.
I'm pretty sure I detected a slight anti-taper in some of the more recent renderings. Does that make it better or worse?

I wish they had gone with the earlier designs with a more continuous, sweeping effect than the all-too-common exposed/missing middle section. That might be OK for a shorter building (or not) but I think it just diminishes the apparent height and overall impact of a super tall.

Just my $0.02...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 8:50 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by resansom View Post
I'm pretty sure I detected a slight anti-taper in some of the more recent renderings. Does that make it better or worse?

I wish they had gone with the earlier designs with a more continuous, sweeping effect than the all-too-common exposed/missing middle section. That might be OK for a shorter building (or not) but I think it just diminishes the apparent height and overall impact of a super tall.

Just my $0.02...
I noticed that too, it flares back out toward the top.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 6:24 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,786
I'm excited to see how tall the skyline will be with this juggernaut

If only Wilson Tower was over 1000' too... but at this point, I just want them to start lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 9:43 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillynova View Post
If only Wilson Tower was over 1000' too... but at this point, I just want them to start lol
I know what you mean. However, Wilson was DOA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 10:12 PM
Bblasa Bblasa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 275
Nooooo why did you have to call it a vacuum now I can’t unsee it hahaha
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2024, 9:36 PM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 597
It at least has the honor of being the most vacuum cleaner-esque building, possibly ever.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2024, 9:22 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbywest87 View Post
It at least has the honor of being the most vacuum cleaner-esque building, possibly ever.
Can't unsee
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2024, 9:43 PM
Bblasa Bblasa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 275
The crown in the newest rendering is much more refined than earlier versions . I think everyone will be in favor of the finished “design “ upon completion
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2024, 9:43 PM
Bblasa Bblasa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 275
(Not that rendering shown a few posts above)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 1:06 AM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbywest87 View Post
It at least has the honor of being the most vacuum cleaner-esque building, possibly ever.

They should be a big, fat 200-foot spire on the back and really make it look like a vacuum cleaner.
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2024, 12:20 AM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,474
Good Lord! That does resemble my Hoover!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2024, 1:08 AM
zx14 zx14 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 306
Looks like the big vacuum from the movie Space Balls
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2024, 5:07 PM
ohhey ohhey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 128
The building looks fine so far (an average C-grade building IMO). The materials are good but the facade pattern is obnoxious.

Going forward, I'm afraid I'll be lowering that grade. Like some other commenters, I'm also not a fan of the disjointed setback and the visual gap between volumes. And I've always thought the design for the top of the building is tacky and looks cheap - funky in a bad way. We'll see if reality is better than the renderings soon enough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 4:19 AM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX / Portland,OR / Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,002
__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2024, 12:45 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,641
Man, it wasn't all that long ago that The Shore and Hotel Van Zandt were the tallest buildings in Rainey and a jarring contrast to the historic bungalows surrounding them. Now they are completely dwarfed by the surrounding towers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbannizer View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2024, 8:28 PM
zx14 zx14 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 306
Looks like they're starting the middle portion which encompasses the 40th floor area. How long do you think this will take before we start to see the tower portion take place
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:07 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.