HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 8:30 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,351
I've been on that road enough, I didn't think it had the traffic after Sylvain to justify twinning. Maybe more passing lanes but twinning seems much. As for the extension to BC (Never Happen).

They really should be twining the highway from Grassland down to Gibbons. And add an interchange at Highway 15.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 10:12 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
https://www.ponokanews.com/news/hwy-...ountain-house/
Interesting, AB-11's to be twinned up to Rocky Mountain House.
Yeah this is a bit of a head scratcher for me as it doesn’t seem like twinning to RMH would be top of the priority list. I would think the Grassland to Gibbons that Airboy mentioned, TCH free-flow or bypass in Med Hat, Nanton, Clarsholm & Ft. MacLeod bypasses, 3-laning the #2 between Calgary & Edmonton would all rate higher (just off the top of my head).
I assume they are trying to spend the dollars in all areas of the province and that is the reason for twinning #11 to RMH.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 11:47 PM
dmuzika dmuzika is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 428
Optamist side: David Thompson County is closer to Edmonton than Jasper and Kananaskis is very popular, so as the article suggests it's trying to spur tourism in the mountains. Cynical side says the area is the bluest of blue ridings so they're trying to keep a loyal base happy.

Last edited by dmuzika; Jul 23, 2020 at 4:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 12:20 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,050
If they are twinning highway 11, then they better extend the highway into BC via the Blaeberry River to Highway 1, otherwise the twined highway will not have enough traffic to justify the expense. Another option would be to remove the tolls on the Jasper to Banff highway.

Last edited by itom 987; Jul 21, 2020 at 12:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 12:39 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,050
Rocky Mountain House is not big enough to justify this twinning.

Money might be better spent on making Nordegg become the next 'Canmore'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 4:37 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmuzika View Post
Optamist side: David Thompson County is closer to Edm9than Jasper and Kananaskis is very popular, so as the article suggests it's trying to spur tourism in the mountains. Cynical side says the area is the bluest of blue ridings so they're trying to keep a loyal base happy.
If it's a true blue riding then there is no need to spend money on them to win votes, as they'll vote UCP regardless.

These twinnings do appear to be on pretty low volume roads - if this one and the Taber one justify twinning then all the roads around Bragg Creek would by the same metric.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 3:18 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,351
How about the last section of 16 from highway 40 to the park gate. And yah that 3rd lane to Calgary.

And a 3rd lane to Stoneyplain.

It also makes more sense to twin highway 2 from Morrinville to Clyde Corner. (Been on the back burner for years).

There was also plans to widen highway 37 from Ft Sask to Onoway. A lot of truck traffic use that route.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 3:46 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Wow, AB-37 will be like Edmonton’s second bypass then. I didn’t know that Anthony Henday Drive was already that busy.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 3:50 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Wow, AB-37 will be like Edmonton’s second bypass then. I didn’t know that Anthony Henday Drive was already that busy.
There is a large number of trucks on the GP run that use it to get to Ft Sask. Been used long before the Henday. And it is faster. Still have to get off the Henday to Get to Ft Sask.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 6:13 PM
the.tru.albertan the.tru.albertan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 195
VERY good news about 11 being twinned to Rocky. I also don't see how it's justified tho. Trying to prepare for a future Howse Pass Highway?!?! Please say it's so!

Sidenote: Sucks C2E forum shutdown... I had a lot of good highway info on that site.
__________________
I drive really slow
In the ultra fast lane
While people behind me
Are going insane.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 7:32 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airboy View Post
How about the last section of 16 from highway 40 to the park gate. And yah that 3rd lane to Calgary.

And a 3rd lane to Stoneyplain.

It also makes more sense to twin highway 2 from Morrinville to Clyde Corner. (Been on the back burner for years).

There was also plans to widen highway 37 from Ft Sask to Onoway. A lot of truck traffic use that route.
My wish list also includes a 3rd lane on the TCH between Calgary and the Banff gate. They could actually just add a single lane and have it reversible - westbound AM and eastbound PM
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 7:33 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by the.tru.albertan View Post
VERY good news about 11 being twinned to Rocky. I also don't see how it's justified tho. Trying to prepare for a future Howse Pass Highway?!?! Please say it's so!

Sidenote: Sucks C2E forum shutdown... I had a lot of good highway info on that site.
I thought you would like that tru
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 7:44 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
My wish list also includes a 3rd lane on the TCH between Calgary and the Banff gate. They could actually just add a single lane and have it reversible - westbound AM and eastbound PM
I don't agree with a reversible lane in a 110-kph zone. In B.C., the speed limit on Alex Fraser Bridge (where there's one) is only 70 ~ 80 kph.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 8:40 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
I don't agree with a reversible lane in a 110-kph zone. In B.C., the speed limit on Alex Fraser Bridge (where there's one) is only 70 ~ 80 kph.
I don't think he was being serious. Six or even eight lanes between Calgary and Banff could easily be justified. I believe the province also has serious plans to add lanes to Highway 2 between Calgary and Edmonton. I believe some stretches are already getting them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 8:41 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by the.tru.albertan View Post
VERY good news about 11 being twinned to Rocky. I also don't see how it's justified tho. Trying to prepare for a future Howse Pass Highway?!?! Please say it's so!

Sidenote: Sucks C2E forum shutdown... I had a lot of good highway info on that site.
That's Jason Nixon country so keeping with the UCP, it is probably so Jason doesn't get stuck behind a tractor.

Adding the 3rd lane on TCH at least to 22 would help a lot.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2020, 12:15 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,902
Yeah I wasn’t serious about the reversible lane between Calgary & Banff - just tongue-in-cheek. Would be great to add a lane in both directions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2020, 2:44 AM
adam-machiavelli adam-machiavelli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,244
I'd rather see that highway 11 money go to building a parking lot and interpretive centre at Abraham Lake to see the bubbles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2020, 3:01 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
I don't think he was being serious. Six or even eight lanes between Calgary and Banff could easily be justified. I believe the province also has serious plans to add lanes to Highway 2 between Calgary and Edmonton. I believe some stretches are already getting them.
What happens when 4 lanes worth of traffic gets to Banff? There's not enough parking or local road capacity to manage any more, nor should we want much more in the park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 4:48 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
https://www.ponokanews.com/news/hwy-...ountain-house/
Interesting, AB-11's to be twinned up to Rocky Mountain House.
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
Yeah this is a bit of a head scratcher for me as it doesn’t seem like twinning to RMH would be top of the priority list. I would think the Grassland to Gibbons that Airboy mentioned, TCH free-flow or bypass in Med Hat, Nanton, Clarsholm & Ft. MacLeod bypasses, 3-laning the #2 between Calgary & Edmonton would all rate higher (just off the top of my head).
I assume they are trying to spend the dollars in all areas of the province and that is the reason for twinning #11 to RMH.
All these plus three laning the TCH from Calgary to Banff park gates. They should do it at least as far as Hwy #22 at a minimum (currently three lanign to Old Banff Coach Road). Also a Strathmore bypass.

This project plus the twinning east of Taber smells like the UPC playing to their base. I can understand the Hwy 3 work, the #11 project is a head scratcher.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 4:50 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
What happens when 4 lanes worth of traffic gets to Banff? There's not enough parking or local road capacity to manage any more, nor should we want much more in the park.
Much of it is through traffic heading to BC. But yes it does bog down. Invermere is 2.5 hour drive and it's routinely taking 4-5 hours on some weekends now.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:07 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.