Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission Most Livable
IAre you saying that because a business MAY at some point in the future APPLY for the license to do something that the business should not be allowed to open?
Why not oppose the license versus the opening of a business? Seems like that is far more reasonable.
|
I don't oppose anything, and I welcome the arrival of Walgreens to Magazine Street. But I think it's likely that Walgreen's will want to sell alcohol here, either immediately or in the future - which is totally fine by me.
The design of the store is my greatest concern with chain drugstores (parking lots facing onto busy pedestrian streets are a bad idea) but that's not an issue here - an earlier article talked about how the parking was going in the back, and there would be two separate entrances from the rear and from the street.
Frankly, I think the whole concept of liquor licenses is absurd, because plenty of disreputable businesses can game the system while perfectly legitimate businesses get shut out by politics and neighborhood opposition. Hell, the wine bar on Oak Street was facing significant opposition IIRC, although they did manage to get it open. That kind of sh*t distorts the market and supports established sellers, who then have very little incentive to keep their stores clean or respond to customer requests.