HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2015, 7:06 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
I'm shocked and really pleased. I did not expect Boulder to do the right thing. At all.
As we get older we tend to get more conservative.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2015, 7:28 PM
The Dirt The Dirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,212
Is NIMBYism really a partisan attitude? I thought NIMBYs come from across the whole political spectrum - they just use different reasons to justify their anti-development attitudes (e.g. lefties will play up environmental concerns while right-wingers will have economic/social concerns).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2015, 7:41 PM
mr1138 mr1138 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dirt View Post
Is NIMBYism really a partisan attitude? I thought NIMBYs come from across the whole political spectrum - they just use different reasons to justify their anti-development attitudes (e.g. lefties will play up environmental concerns while right-wingers will have economic/social concerns).
Agreed. Don't forget anti-corporatism on the liberal side. "The developers bought and paid for this election... Big money wins every time... Outside developers are buying up our city and ruining our quality of life..."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2015, 8:50 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dirt View Post
Is NIMBYism really a partisan attitude? I thought NIMBYs come from across the whole political spectrum - they just use different reasons to justify their anti-development attitudes (e.g. lefties will play up environmental concerns while right-wingers will have economic/social concerns).
I think the development community would say unequivocally yes, liberal communities tend to run more NIMBY. Conservative communities in general tend to be far more pro-development.

I would suggest that affordability data backs this up too. There's this classic Atlantic article, "Why Middle-Class Americans Can't Afford to Live in Liberal Cities" http://www.theatlantic.com/business/...rdable/382045/

There are at least a few conservative philosophies that run counter to NIMBYism... property rights, and general leave-me-alone libertarianism. There is really no equivalent on the liberal side. Affordability would be the big one, but many liberals will vehemently deny the existence of a causal relationship there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2015, 9:47 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunt_q View Post
Affordability would be the big one, but many liberals will vehemently deny the existence of a causal relationship there.
And environmentalism, although probably a lot more in the east than the west for that. The smart growth agendas that come out of groups like the Sierra Club in the east are TOTALLY different than their growth control/open space agendas out west.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2015, 10:29 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
And environmentalism, although probably a lot more in the east than the west for that. The smart growth agendas that come out of groups like the Sierra Club in the east are TOTALLY different than their growth control/open space agendas out west.
You have environmental groups pushing pro-growth, pro-density, anti-NIMBY agendas out there? That's interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2015, 4:24 AM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,483
Absolutely. They're some of the biggest allies. Sierra Club prominently supports smart growth, and the Coalition for Smarter Growth (a really great non-profit with no Denver equivalent that I know of) was started and is partly funded by a coalition of conservation groups.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2015, 6:48 AM
Scottk's Avatar
Scottk Scottk is offline
Denver
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
I'm shocked and really pleased. I did not expect Boulder to do the right thing. At all.
lost by a pretty big margin too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2015, 3:44 PM
mr1138 mr1138 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,073
For those who don't already know of this, or are interested, much of the anti-growth sentiment in Boulder can be traced to a man named Al Bartlett and his famous talk "Arithmetic, Population, and Energy." A video of which can be seen here. http://www.albartlett.org/presentati...on_energy.html

This kind of thinking really riled people in Boulder up in the post-war era, and has a lot to do with the way Boulderites think about population growth in relation to environmentalism. I saw the talk once about a year before he died (still being given on an old fashioned overhead projector). His basic mathematical premise is not wrong, but its application to 21st century urban growth patterns in a place like the Colorado Front Range can be easily challenged by smart-growth advocates. In the 1970s though, when growth was defined exclusively by suburban sprawl patterns and the Denver area had less than 1 million people, this was pretty innovative stuff.

To me it explains a lot about Boulder, and why many long time residents still see no-growth as the most environmental alternative; ignoring the fact that surrounding communities will happily take that growth for themselves. I'm happy to see this may be finally eroding though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2015, 4:26 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
He's an idiot. As are all people who think you can stop growth through planning. (Unless you price people out, of course which is what we've really done.) "Ray gun growth control" is what we called it in the 90s...and it was about as realistic as ray guns. Those sorts of environmentalists really are some of the worst people in the world. Because they're not environmentalists at all, they're elitist rich white pigs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2015, 4:42 PM
mr1138 mr1138 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,073
I think there is a legitimate question though of whether these people actually think we can stop growth through local planning, or simply saw Boulder and the open space belt as a sort of "demonstration" to the world. This probably varies from person to person. Boulder DID succeed on demonstrating that preserving your natural beauty, as opposed to plowing over it with suburban subdivisions, can improve quality of life. I don't think advocates of urban density can even argue with that.

But I completely agree it is idiotic to think you can stop growth through planning. That's putting the cart before the horse. Hence the heated debate in Boulder today between smart-growth advocates, who as Cirrus points out are actually backed by true environmentalists, and hacks who took Al's talk to mean that a city of less than 100,000 people can stop human population growth by throwing a temper tantrum and blocking their own growth. Based on his talk, Al was actually one of these people. He's not wrong that the exponential human growth curve cannot continue forever globally - but he was dead wrong that Boulder can do anything to stop it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2015, 4:45 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr1138 View Post
He's not wrong that the exponential human growth curve cannot continue forever globally - but he was dead wrong that Boulder can do anything to stop it.
Right. The solution to this is to build schools is Africa, not buy open space around Boulder.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2015, 7:09 PM
Denver Dweller Denver Dweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 828
Elbert County sweet spot for balancing living costs and incomes

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2015, 2:36 AM
seventwenty's Avatar
seventwenty seventwenty is offline
I took a bus pic, CIRRUS
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Soon to be banned
Posts: 1,697
Tight supply, high demand make resort-town workers scramble for homes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Denver Post
The worst-ever rental market in Colorado's mountain communities is fueled by a convergence of several factors, including a booming tourism economy drawing record numbers of visitors, prodding employers to grow and hire more workers.

Add to that a lack of new affordable housing construction in the last half-decade as towns grappled with the economic downturn. And then there's the surge in homeowners converting properties they once rented to locals into short-term or seasonal rentals for the growing wave of tourists.

. . .

Tim Gagen said the rental housing deficit in Breckenridge and Summit County is the worst he's seen in 15 years. Like other town leaders across Colorado's high country, he's calling it a crisis. The longtime Breckenridge town manager said leaders are pushing their immediate focus from affordable ownership to rental, with a project set to open early next year with 45 units available for rent. Two more projects will add about 100 more units, but those won't be ready until 2017.

Gagen admits the town "was really surprised" by both the rapid decline in rental supply and the surging demand.

It's a lament heard across the high country. Few saw this coming.

The economic rebound in the mountains is setting records. Sales tax revenues are reaching all-time highs as more people visit to play. More people are moving to the mountains for work and employers are ramping up hiring. Construction jobs are returning as developers and investors return to the reviving mountain real estate markets.

But the housing stock is not keeping up. It's even tighter with locals who lost their homes in the Great Recession crowding the pool of renters.

. . .

When facing the option of filling a home with four or five young locals for the year or renting to the higher-paying vacationer, it's understandable that homeowners are leaning beyond long-term leases. Short-term guests can multiply annual revenue while the home gets professionally cleaned dozens of times a year.

. . .

In most mountain communities, there hasn't been new multifamily construction by private developers for years. Developers who are returning to the market are focusing on high-dollar single-family homes and condos.

Most new long-term rental properties are built through local housing authorities or governments. And those projects take years to plan, approve, fund and build.

Last week, Summit County voters overwhelming approved the continuation of a sales tax that funds construction of workforce housing. But even if construction of new rental homes begins today, and developers start building affordable units as a requirement for their high-end projects, "that is not enough to overcome the burden we have right now," Gagen said.

That sense of urgency is widespread in the high country. It's spurring out-of-the-box thinking.

In Steamboat, real estate broker Jon Wade is renting the 33-room Alpiner Lodge he and a partner own to a property management company that needs lodging for its housekeeping employees. Down the street, the Sheraton Steamboat Resort is putting up workers at the dormant, city-owned Iron Horse Inn.

Wade said the rental housing crisis began when locals began losing their homes in the recession, spiking demand for long-term rentals.

"Then, when the economy improved, there was less supply so it tightened up more quickly," Wade said.

. . .

Wade said "it was no small effort" to get the city to allow the local housekeepers to rent rooms at his Alpiner Lodge by the month. The city building department deemed the switch from nightly rentals a change of use. Wade spent a bunch of money to negotiate the change and open his hotel to local workers.

"They almost made it hard enough that it wasn't worth it," Wade said. "They just made it harder and more expensive to provide the affordable housing the city wanted. Do we want to make it more expensive to do things we need?"

The lack of rental housing and affordable homes in Steamboat has been impacted in a so-far immeasurable way by the surge in vacation rentals. (Few towns have tracked how many homes that were once rented by workers are now available for short-term rental.)

Since 2009, the number of short-term Steamboat rentals listed on VRBO and HomeAway has swelled 175 percent to 1,865, according to data provided to The Denver Post by the websites.


__________________
The happy & obtuse bro.

"Of course you're right." Cirrus
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2015, 5:27 AM
acw007's Avatar
acw007 acw007 is offline
Arachnid Wrangler
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fort Collins
Posts: 1,309
Foothills

Here's a nice video on the Foothills redevelopment:

Video Link


There was a holiday grand opening this weekend and the mall looks substantially further along
than it looks in this video. Its quite impressive in person. The residential phase of this
development will really round out the neighborhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2015, 4:17 AM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by acw007 View Post
Here's a nice video on the Foothills redevelopment:

Video Link


There was a holiday grand opening this weekend and the mall looks substantially further along
than it looks in this video. Its quite impressive in person. The residential phase of this
development will really round out the neighborhood.
Let's see if this will work? To use the YouTube function just copy the last part after the ?v=
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2015, 5:17 AM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,670
Site Development Plan Approved for The Grove
9/4/2015 Littleton gov.org
Quote:
City staff has approved a site development plan for Zocalo Community Development to build a multi-million dollar, mixed-use project at 2100 West Littleton Boulevard called The Grove. The Grove will consist of 160 luxury apartments for empty-nesters over the age of 55 and almost 11,000 square-feet of retail space.

Rendering courtesy KTGY via Lakewood Connect


Rendering courtesy of KTGY via The Denver Channel

Neighbors fight city to stop building luxury homes in their 'historic' neighborhood
Nov 8, 2015 by Brendaliss Gonzalez The Denver Channel
Quote:
LITTLETON, Colo. - A Littleton homeowner and her neighbors are taking their concerns of a new development project approved by city administrators to court.

"It looks like urban architecture dropped like a bomb into an existing historic neighborhood," said Peter Teneyck, who lives near the proposed site located at 2100 W. Littleton Blvd.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2015, 12:16 AM
CastleScott CastleScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sacramento Ca/formerly CastleRock Co
Posts: 1,055
Just a question for you Colorado forumers..

Is that 22 story Monarch hotel and casino in Black Hawk being built on the former site of Colorado Central Station?

Scott
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2015, 5:52 PM
denconyny denconyny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by CastleScott View Post
Just a question for you Colorado forumers..

Is that 22 story Monarch hotel and casino in Black Hawk being built on the former site of Colorado Central Station?

Scott
From this link

http://news.worldcasinodirectory.com...formation-4465

Yes.... there is to be a new 22 story hotel/casino to be build in Black Hawk, but it is on the site of the former Riviera Casino, which Monarch now owns, and not the Colorado Central Station.

This a a project that's going to take 3 years to complete in 3 stages -
Stage 1, build a new parking structure,
Stage 2, tear down the old parking structure and
Stage 3, build the 22 story tower on the space of the torn-down parking structure.

So it appears that currently the new parking structure is being built.

Other links

http://mbarenonv.com/project/monarch-casino-resort/

http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/ne...ino-hotel.html

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2015, 2:50 AM
Denver Dweller Denver Dweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 828
Marijuana has huge influence on Colorado tourism, state survey says

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.