HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 2:17 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,333
That's using the 30,000 square feet of air rights. I wonder what kind of massing we could be looking at.

If this somewhat has a similar parcel dimension to say 432 Park, and they go with condos or something in the residential spectrum, could be kind of sizable I feel.

Would be nice for 423 and 425 Park to have some larger company, even if slender in nature.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 2:45 AM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,167
edit: oh nevermind that's the office tower, not the co-op. Still a shame they couldn't piece together something larger as was intended with the rezoning. I don't think they intended for individual towers like this to be demolished and replaced by others comprising a few more stories. They envisioned botique towers like 425 Park and soaring supertalls like 1 Vanderbilt.

417 is apparently doomed as well, though.

https://newyorkyimby.com/2020/07/demo-pe...rk-avenue-in-midtown-east-manhattan.html

Demo Permits Filed for 417 Park Avenue in Midtown East, Manhattan - July 2020
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!

Last edited by Hudson11; Jan 16, 2021 at 2:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 3:03 AM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,167
It'd be a real shame if these two plots couldn't be combined to put up a larger tower as envisioned by the rezoning. The point of the rezoning was modernization, but still, a 17 floor office building biting the dust for a 21 story one and a beautiful pre-war co-op going the way of the dodo for who knows what would be an aesthetic overlook for the neighborhood.
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 3:19 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,333
It could yield something substantial if part of the same assemblage. For the location, they should definitely go for the option that allows max potential.

Even if they have to wait based on their risk mitigation, better to have something grand per say than lackluster and short. If it goes residential, could be sizable if the two are combined.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 4:27 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,181
The initial plan, as I recall, was to reclad it and add a few floors. The key to the puzzle might be the little, mid-block building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 4:44 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 34,680
I thought the former residential building to the north now has the same ownership. I remember reading something where the northern site sold to the owners of the southern site, or vice-versa.

This is an assemblage, probably for a full-block trophy office tower. The entire block now has demo filings, BTW, even the little holdout in the middle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 5:27 AM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,167
I don't recall the two buildings ever coming under the same ownership. In fact, I imagine minus a joint venture, which I also don't recall reading any news about, the two would be quite belligerent in selling to the other considering the value of the real estate and its air rights.
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 10:40 AM
Visionist's Avatar
Visionist Visionist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 248
It'll be a sad day when 417 Park is demolished. With the Drake long gone there's almost no pre wars left in this area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 12:06 PM
Visionist's Avatar
Visionist Visionist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 248
The homogenisation of Park Avenue is nearly complete.

Anybody have pictures of how it used to look before the war?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 1:29 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionist View Post
It'll be a sad day when 417 Park is demolished. With the Drake long gone there's almost no pre wars left in this area.
I agree.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 2:41 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Closeted Normie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 12,855
All the more frustrating knowing that if they really wanted to they could preaerve the facade and reincorporate itt in to the base of a new tower.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 3:12 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11 View Post
I don't think they intended for individual towers like this to be demolished and replaced by others comprising a few more stories. They envisioned botique towers like 425 Park and soaring supertalls like 1 Vanderbilt.

417 is apparently doomed as well, though.

https://newyorkyimby.com/2020/07/demo-pe...rk-avenue-in-midtown-east-manhattan.html

Demo Permits Filed for 417 Park Avenue in Midtown East, Manhattan - July 2020

They envisioned new, modern office space replacing older office space, of all stripes in the district. Because of the density of east midtown (as opposed to the west side), you aren't going to get the large assemblages to build larger towers. 415 Madison Avenue is on the same trajectory as this site, though both could eventually be assembled into a larger site.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 3:54 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,612
These sights may eventually be merged, but a pic from the other thread...



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 6:20 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,333
If that middle building is really what's stopping a big assemblage, that's a big bummer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2021, 8:14 PM
Visionist's Avatar
Visionist Visionist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 248
Taking 417's extant rights and adding them to 405's along with anything from the Stefano place and what was bought from St Patrick's would probably still yield a 700 footer with boutique floorplates and 417 could be saved.

Too logical.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2021, 3:34 AM
NYer34 NYer34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 144
It just feels like someone (everyone?) in NYC development really must delight in spiting the city and its history.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted May 7, 2021, 2:29 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,167
Still nothing on a sale of 405, but tiny boi at 409 is getting torn down too.

https://newyorkyimby.com/2021/05/demo-permits-filed-for-409-park-avenue-in-midtown-manhattan.html

Demo Permits Filed for 409 Park Avenue in Midtown, Manhattan

__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2021, 10:15 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,167
looks like this was a massing used to market the site before it was purchased by GSDNY and Klovern. 409 Park has since been added to the assemblage. I foresee something like 415 Madison rising here with 405 turning into a glassy restack with a few extra stories.



CBRE
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2021, 11:17 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,181
I hope that 430 Park gets redeveloped. It’s hideous.

https://marxrealty.com/portfolio/430-park-ave/

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2021, 4:04 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 34,680
Yeah, 430 Park needs to go. Would be a perfect spot for a boutique tower for hedge funds, VC, PE and the like.

Hopefully a supertall or near-supertall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.