HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2020, 7:30 PM
theman23's Avatar
theman23 theman23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ville de Québec
Posts: 6,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by YUNEMUS View Post
I don't think that Bellingham would be a bedroom community of Vancouver.
For example Hamilton is not a bedroom community of Toronto
Even Hamilton is closer to Toronto than Bellingham - Vancouver distance

Bellingham Vancouver 86 KM
Hamilton Toronto 68 KM



.
Hehehe


Wouldn’t Bellingham likely have developed into BCs premier city if were part of Canada? Closer to the ocean, closer to the states, less constrained by mountains?
__________________
For entertainment purposes only. Not financial advice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2020, 10:08 PM
YUNEMUS's Avatar
YUNEMUS YUNEMUS is offline
Yunus Üstünol
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by theman23 View Post
Hehehe


Wouldn’t Bellingham likely have developed into BCs premier city if were part of Canada? Closer to the ocean, closer to the states, less constrained by mountains?
Yes it would be..
I never thought this way.
even if it wasn't the biggest city in BC it would have at least 500,000 population
__________________
My Photos

🆈🆄🅽🆄🆂 🆄🆂🆃🆄🅽🅾🅻

SnowMan in SkyscraperCity
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2020, 5:46 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 13,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by theman23 View Post
...


Wouldn’t Bellingham likely have developed into BCs premier city if were part of Canada? Closer to the ocean, closer to the states, less constrained by mountains?
No, not necessarily, because Bellingham doesn't have as much land around it suitable for agriculture or development (the only suitable land spreads to the north), and Vancouver's harbour is better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2020, 1:35 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by YUNEMUS View Post
How would it affect Bellingham if the boundaries were like on the map above?
Quote:
Originally Posted by theman23 View Post
Hehehe


Wouldn’t Bellingham likely have developed into BCs premier city if were part of Canada? Closer to the ocean, closer to the states, less constrained by mountains?
Yes, IMO that is much what would have happened. There would still be a major Western Canadian terminus, depending on the access canyon or valley most available,, but not as it is now.
I think that, as it would not have been wedged up against the North Shore mountains, there might still have been railway / industrial areas and towns wehere Vancouver is now.
The sunnier parts of SW Canada, extending to now-NW Washington State, would have been more coveted for their sunnier, milder conditions, areas near the mountains less regarded.
I'm sure Vancouver would still have turned out to be similar to the city we have today, only displaced southward and more sprawling, with farming towns around it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:03 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.