Quote:
Originally Posted by ocman
The Rams play in Inglewood, The LA Times is now headquartered in El Segundo, the Galaxy plays in Carson, Disney is headquartered in Burbank. If LA can claim them as their own (which it will and does and often in the city discussions forum), especially when it wants to boost it’s image or metrics by including them, certainly it goes the other way around too.
LA is more of a county, than a city. If you’re from LA county, you’re from LA in regards to the rest of the country or state. When the conversation takes place in LA among southern Californians, then it makes sense to be more specific with the actual city and neighborhood.
|
I think its actually the other way around. LA doesn't have to claim anything since its already a globally recognizable powerhouse. What we have is corporations attaching their name to the city. The most ridiculous one I can think of ?
"The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim" Literally the most ridiculous name in the history of the sports world

but since LA is more recognizable than Anaheim, they changed the name, with most of the residents in the OC furious with the change, already being in an everlasting shadow of LA.
Disney is different. What came first? Disney Studios/corporate office or Disneyland ? Disney studios/Corporate office opened decades before Disneyland did. So LA can claim the studios rightfully so but cant claim Disneyland and actually never does and neither does Disneyland vice versa.
Everything else. as said before. Its just easier to attach yourself to LA than the city you're in because its more recognizable. LA isn't doing it or asking for it, corporations are doing it for the exposure and value.
Imagine having the Carson Chargers or Lakewood Rams or the Pico Rivera Clippers. Hell how about the Norwalk Lakers ? HAHA everybody would be sooooo confused.