HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8181  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2016, 12:31 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I'd imagine that the only real knocks on BC Place from a soccer fan's perspective is the lack of all-important natural turf and the fact that it's oversized relative to typical MLS attendances in Vancouver (the same issue the Lions have dealt with pretty well since the beginning with BC Place). They're legitimate issues but the Whitecaps would probably be walking into a bunch of other issues just to fix those two.
I've never attended a match at BC Place but I think the fact that it is oversized would be the major issue. It may not be something that needs to be addressed ASAP but a great atmosphere is central to the experience of attending a match and intimate stadiums facilitate the creation of this atmosphere. If the stadium was more intimate, it could help overcome the issue of not having natural grass and being indoors. Nevertheless, the Caps have a good setup.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
     
     
  #8182  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2016, 1:58 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riise View Post
I've never attended a match at BC Place but I think the fact that it is oversized would be the major issue. It may not be something that needs to be addressed ASAP but a great atmosphere is central to the experience of attending a match and intimate stadiums facilitate the creation of this atmosphere. If the stadium was more intimate, it could help overcome the issue of not having natural grass and being indoors. Nevertheless, the Caps have a good setup.
The curtain system they put in a few years ago during the renovations improved the situation dramatically... now, if there's a crowd of 20,000 attending a game, you will see maybe about 8,000 empty seats instead of the 40,000 empty seats you would have seen under the previous configuration.

The stadium doesn't look intimate by any stretch (I haven't been there myself since the 2011 renos), but the problem is nowhere near as bad as it once was.
     
     
  #8183  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2016, 4:11 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
The curtain system they put in a few years ago during the renovations improved the situation dramatically... now, if there's a crowd of 20,000 attending a game, you will see maybe about 8,000 empty seats instead of the 40,000 empty seats you would have seen under the previous configuration.

The stadium doesn't look intimate by any stretch (I haven't been there myself since the 2011 renos), but the problem is nowhere near as bad as it once was.

From: http://vincechow.ca/photos/whitecaps-bc-place-stadium/
     
     
  #8184  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2016, 4:28 PM
cjones2451's Avatar
cjones2451 cjones2451 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Port Moody, BC
Posts: 871
It is much better for atmosphere, but the "gaps" in the draping have always bugged me. Is it just me? Seems half-assed

Last edited by cjones2451; Nov 14, 2016 at 4:29 PM. Reason: Size
     
     
  #8185  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 5:30 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjones2451 View Post
It is much better for atmosphere, but the "gaps" in the draping have always bugged me. Is it just me? Seems half-assed
I thought it was a joke the first time I saw it. Surely they can come up with a better way to block off the upper bowl. Like you said it's better than nothing but looks like a child came up with it.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #8186  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 6:03 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,157
I would call it one of the worst soccer venues in MLS. To think we could have had a soccer specific stadium. All with private money.
     
     
  #8187  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 2:11 PM
drummer_god drummer_god is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
White tarps over the upper level seats would make the gaps between the curtains less noticeable.
     
     
  #8188  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 2:13 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
I would call it one of the worst soccer venues in MLS. To think we could have had a soccer specific stadium. All with private money.
It depends on how much you want to weigh your opinion on overall stadium versus soccer suitability versus location.

Overall stadium BC Place is one of the best in the MLS.
Soccer suitability BC Place is somewhere in the middle/lower end.
Location is one of the better in the MLS.

I think a lot of people really underestimate how far the MLS has come in the past ten years when it comes to soccer-specific stadiums and building venues more well-suited to their franchises. There was a time when the MLS strictly played in much larger NFL/NCAA stadiums but that has mostly shifted to venues like Avaya Stadium, BBVA Compass, or Talen Energy, which have been considerable additions to the league.

As long as the Whitecaps are happy with BC Place, attendance keeps trending in the right direction and stays at a reasonable level, and there's no significant alternative venue, then BC Place is it for the forseeable future. Venues can get a lot worse than BC Place.
     
     
  #8189  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 2:28 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
The gaps are okay as the point isn't to look up.
     
     
  #8190  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 3:23 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
The gaps are okay as the point isn't to look up.
Yes... when you watch the games on TV, you really don't notice the gaps. It's something I only notice when I'm looking right at them. So I'd say the curtain system works fairly well.

As to the point regarding location, I'd say that's a fairly significant asset for BC Place. Let's face it, the days of the late 70s when there were swaths of relatively inexpensive industrial brownfield sites around central Vancouver are decidedly over... it would be hard to duplicate BC Place's central location close to downtown hubs and transit.
     
     
  #8191  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 4:26 PM
FrankieFlowerpot's Avatar
FrankieFlowerpot FrankieFlowerpot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
I would call it one of the worst soccer venues in MLS. To think we could have had a soccer specific stadium. All with private money.
Yankee Stadium, Gillette Stadium and RFK are all substantially worse
     
     
  #8192  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 6:12 PM
cjones2451's Avatar
cjones2451 cjones2451 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Port Moody, BC
Posts: 871
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
I would call it one of the worst soccer venues in MLS. To think we could have had a soccer specific stadium. All with private money.
Worst - really....RFK, Yankee Stadium, even Mapfre it's bench seating? People are also going nuts about the Impact selling 60+K for the playoff game, but the seating layout in the Big O is terrible

We could have done a lot worse. While I agree the waterfront stadium would have been nice, the design was for 15K seats, and not much room to expand, nor would city council or the NIMBYs in the area let that happen.
     
     
  #8193  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 9:00 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjones2451 View Post
Worst - really....RFK, Yankee Stadium, even Mapfre it's bench seating? People are also going nuts about the Impact selling 60+K for the playoff game, but the seating layout in the Big O is terrible

.
The Big O isn't actually that bad for football and soccer in my experience. Baseball is another story, especially when the crowd is small.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #8194  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2016, 12:24 AM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
I thought these tarps the Argos used to cover the upper deck seats at Rogers Centre in the mid 2000's worked.They were drawing on average 30,000+ fans a game back then too. It looks the best and far better than what BC Place is using to hide their upperdeck right now.

link: http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threads/rogers-centre-new-look-for-argos.2138/
     
     
  #8195  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2016, 3:18 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
I thought these tarps the Argos used to cover the upper deck seats at Rogers Centre in the mid 2000's worked.They were drawing on average 30,000+ fans a game back then too. It looks the best and far better than what BC Place is using to hide their upperdeck right now.

link: http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threads/rogers-centre-new-look-for-argos.2138/
Those cover seats, but they don't create a feeling of enclosure the way that BC Place's do. As others have mentioned, yeah they look kind of silly with the gaps when you're looking straight at them, but when you're watching the actual game as you would if you were actually there, it just makes it feel like there's a roof above you.
     
     
  #8196  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2016, 3:26 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
Those cover seats, but they don't create a feeling of enclosure the way that BC Place's do. As others have mentioned, yeah they look kind of silly with the gaps when you're looking straight at them, but when you're watching the actual game as you would if you were actually there, it just makes it feel like there's a roof above you.
Agree. A single wrap around curtain that fall from the roof to the start of the lower bowl would be best. Some people just aren't very visual and aren't bothered by things like this. For those that are, not noticing the tarp and gaps is next to impossible. It's a constant distraction.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #8197  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2016, 7:08 AM
Dalreg's Avatar
Dalreg Dalreg is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,997
If you are that easily distracted then perhaps stay home?
__________________
Blow this popsicle stand
     
     
  #8198  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2016, 12:56 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
The stadium doesn't look intimate by any stretch (I haven't been there myself since the 2011 renos), but the problem is nowhere near as bad as it once was.
It's not perfect but it is far from unacceptable. Until they move into a purpose built ground, it'll do nicely.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
     
     
  #8199  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2016, 2:39 PM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalreg View Post
If you are that easily distracted then perhaps stay home?
Maybe that distraction is why BC Place has so many empty seats.
     
     
  #8200  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2016, 3:16 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
Maybe that distraction is why BC Place has so many empty seats.
Whitecaps set a franchise record for attendance this past season.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.