HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 1:24 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Funny. I was thinking for awhile "what if Amazon offered a few of the runner ups small but still significant offices or expansions." Maybe 500 or a thousand or two. Not as many as 25,000 or 50,000 but even a few thousand would be cool for any city. Less in the way of tax breaks too.

Kind of curious to see if this would happen to anybody.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 3:33 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
I put my money on NY and Virginia not getting anywhere near 25,000 jobs each when all is up and running.

This will end up being a giant scam
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 5:36 PM
Kenmore Kenmore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Uptown
Posts: 652
amazon news isn't unexpected but it's still GREAT to hear, major win for chicago
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 8:14 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
...
One moment I remember at LGA was coming back home during Lollapalooza weekend Thursday evening. These girls were so excited that they got "group 2" boarding. Their reaction was priceless when they saw 3/4 of the plane board before. All business travelers.
...
I always get at least Group 2 on United because I hold their Visa, but it's become rather meaningless. I think it's odd they even bother to have more than three groups given how most of their flights actually get boarded. The only plus to always getting Group 2 is that it usually means that, even with all those business travelers going first, there's enough room for my carry-on.
__________________
[SIZE="1"]I like travel and photography - check out my [URL="https://www.flickr.com/photos/ericmathiasen/"]Flickr page[/URL].
CURRENT GEAR: Nikon Z6, Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikon 50mm f1.4G
STOLEN GEAR: (during riots of 5/30/2020) Nikon D750, Nikon 14-24mm F2.8G, Nikon 85mm f1.8G, Nikon 50mm f1.4D
[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:49 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
I always get at least Group 2 on United because I hold their Visa, but it's become rather meaningless. I think it's odd they even bother to have more than three groups given how most of their flights actually get boarded. The only plus to always getting Group 2 is that it usually means that, even with all those business travelers going first, there's enough room for my carry-on.
Yeah, it really depends on when you travel and between what cities but between/from a few it's pretty much pointless except for the overhead space. Monday morning, Thursday afternoon, etc from/to cities like Chicago, NYC, Boston, DC, Atlanta, Dallas, etc pretty much pointless - you aren't going to get on the plane fast unless you have higher status. I stopped traveling nearly 2 years ago now, but still have some status and literally the only reason I find it useful is for the overhead space issues. I have pre-check (get it if you don't have it) so as long as the airport has it and it's open (F*ck LGA on this - they close the line at like 7pm - so dumb and there's pretty much no such thing as priority line at the American terminal anyway), the priority security line doesn't even matter anymore.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:55 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
I always get at least Group 2 on United because I hold their Visa, but it's become rather meaningless. I think it's odd they even bother to have more than three groups given how most of their flights actually get boarded. The only plus to always getting Group 2 is that it usually means that, even with all those business travelers going first, there's enough room for my carry-on.
Yeah. . . the United Visa card is good for the boarding group, checked bag and Untied Club passes (although you're essentially buying them at the end of the day) but it's still worth it for the miles that I accumulate. . .

Also I wonder where these people buy tickets from that are in boarding group 5. . . I mean, really???

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 12:10 AM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
Also I wonder where these people buy tickets from that are in boarding group 5. . . I mean, really???

. . .
That's for the "basic economy" folks...... Don't ever do that if you don't have to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 12:11 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
Yeah. . . the United Visa card is good for the boarding group, checked bag and Untied Club passes (although you're essentially buying them at the end of the day) but it's still worth it for the miles that I accumulate. . .

Also I wonder where these people buy tickets from that are in boarding group 5. . . I mean, really???

. . .
Oh yeah - forgot the checked bag perks. Those are nice too. Where are they buying from? Just normally online or through like Cheap-O-Air or something like that. I always feel bad for them. American Airlines doesn't even hide the fact anymore that they won't get overhead baggage space. They will announce now if you are in one of the last groups, then you should just check your bag in for free basically on flights to or from a city with a lot of business travelers.

By the way, does the United card get you into the business class lounge if you are traveling internationally?
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 4:50 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
look at us still talking
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockerzzz View Post
Us Group 5 people pay cash via debit cards for airline tickets. We don't revolve short term debt at 19% APR. We don't pay $95 annual fees every year. And we don't try to impress others with a plastic card in our wallet that allows us to rack up debt while spending 12-18% more on each purchase than someone paying cash.

The average American has $6,375 of credit card debt, but let me guess: everyone here pays off the balance in full every month.

Group 5!
I have credit cards (that I pay off every month), but still group 5... even if I'm charging it to the grant because any money spent on travel is less money to pay me or buy equipment...
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.

All you need is a modest house in a modest neighborhood, in a modest town where honest people dwell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 4:57 AM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockerzzz View Post
The average American has $6,375 of credit card debt, but let me guess: everyone here pays off the balance in full every month.
i do and always have. and i get sign up bonuses, points, de facto rental/trip insurance, purchase protection, and an 800+ credit score ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If you have the discipline to pay it off every month, it seems silly to use cash or debit instead. If you don't have the discipline or are prone to overspend beyond your means, than sure cut up the plastic. Whatever works for you is the correct answer, but it is possible to use CCs responsibly (and to your benefit)

Last edited by Via Chicago; Nov 14, 2018 at 5:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 6:21 AM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,451
I have businesses where we spend a shit ton on expenses and can use cards responsibly and just rack up mountains of points. I basically run a big chunk of materials purchases for my rehabs through my AMEX and pay it off literally same day since I am constantly drawing on my construction line to pay those expenses anyhow. I also put my car down payment on my card and we put our entire wedding on cards. We paid all the bills off immediately and now have huge credit limits and lots of points. We were able to cover almost our entire honeymoon with points, basically only had to pay for stuff we actually bought while there since the hotels and flights were covered with points. If you use cards responsibly you win as the consumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 3:25 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockerzzz View Post
Debit cards have the same purchase protection.



Using credit cards reduces the friction in each purchase which encourages overspending. Sure, you may think the points are worth it and you're outsmarting Visa (market cap: $319B) and Mastercard (market cap: $209B), but you're spending more than you normally would by using credit.



If you get 2% cash back, you need to spend $100,000 on credit cards to make $2,000. But at the same time you just overspent by 12-18%.
Don't confuse the fact that people with access to financial institutions tend to be higher income and more likely to spend more money with a "cash discount". People aren't spending more at McDonald's with a credit card because MCD is upcharging them for using a card. They are spending more because people with cards tend to have more money and therefore spend more money. Think of it this way, zero percent of panhandlers who drop into McDonald's for a meal use credit. Their bill is probably whatever change they've managed to gather. That has nothing to do with the benefits of cards vs cash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 3:30 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockerzzz View Post
Us Group 5 people pay cash via debit cards for airline tickets. We don't revolve short term debt at 19% APR. We don't pay $95 annual fees every year. And we don't try to impress others with a plastic card in our wallet that allows us to rack up debt while spending 12-18% more on each purchase than someone paying cash.

The average American has $6,375 of credit card debt, but let me guess: everyone here pays off the balance in full every month.

Group 5!
I have never paid $0.01 in interest on a credit card. I never will and it's our primary form of paying for everything.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 5:33 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,574
Quote:
Us Group 5 people pay cash via debit cards for airline tickets.
That's what gets you into Group 5??? Does not compute. . .

Quote:
We don't revolve short term debt at 19% APR.
I couldn't tell you what my APR is because I don't care. . . I pay the balance off every month. . .

Quote:
We don't pay $95 annual fees every year.
And you don't get two United Club passes annually either, nor do you get boarding group 2, a free checked bag or frequent flyer mile bonuses on United. . .

Quote:
And we don't try to impress others with a plastic card in our wallet that allows us to rack up debt
Who am I trying to impress?

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:35 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenmore View Post
amazon news isn't unexpected but it's still GREAT to hear, major win for chicago
I think by "major win" you really mean dodged a bullet. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 6:22 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,838
^ I agree, the generous offers from cities/states were premised on them landing the whole enchilada. If Amazon comes back to Chicago with a smaller proposal, they shouldn’t get one dollar of incentives. If they really see value in spreading their operations among many cities in different regions of the US, then they need Chicago more than we need them...

Also this does not bode well for Lincoln Yards. With direct Red Line access, The 78 might be able to squeak by like Lakeshore East and Central Station did, by downscaling or eliminating the office component and creating a unique, compelling residential neighborhood where people will want to live. At Lincoln Yards, though, Amazon was the only force with a chance of holding back the NIMBYs. I think we’ll continue to see expansion of the CBD into Fulton Market but not necessarily to other new areas.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 6:48 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,338
I'd suspect that Sterling Bay/JP Morgan has a plan B and plan C for Lincoln Yards.
The rest of the big developments feel more tentative.

I'm curious to see if the leasing logjam breaks now that Amazon has finally decided. Lots of big names looking for space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 9:10 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
I'd suspect that Sterling Bay/JP Morgan has a plan B and plan C for Lincoln Yards.
The rest of the big developments feel more tentative.

I'm curious to see if the leasing logjam breaks now that Amazon has finally decided. Lots of big names looking for space.
Hmmm I don't know, I agree with emathias that "The 78" has the edge over Lincoln Yards right now, at least location-wise
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:09 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Hmmm I don't know, I agree with emathias that "The 78" has the edge over Lincoln Yards right now, at least location-wise
Not if you don’t have a huge anchor. You could start knocking chunks of LY off for residential tomorrow and do great if the approvals were in hand. Though I think they are still courting Amazon alternatives...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:23 PM
IrishIllini IrishIllini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Hmmm I don't know, I agree with emathias that "The 78" has the edge over Lincoln Yards right now, at least location-wise
Wasn't it ardecila that said the 78 had a better location? They're both two of my favorite posters, so I'm fine agreeing with either. I think Lincoln Yards and the north branch in general are well suited for robotics/AI labs and start-ups. I'm imagining a live-work district with showrooms for the public to check out emerging technology and buy stuff. That may slow or prevent the mega developments from taking hold. I don't see how these areas are attractive to major corporations without major infrastructure improvements. Even then it's hard to see how it competes with the 78 site. Interestingly enough, it's the same distance between Goose Island and Ogilvie as it is between the 78 and Ogilvie (1.4 mi). Union is a bit closer to the 78.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:41 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.