HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10141  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 10:24 PM
Outta here's Avatar
Outta here Outta here is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 1060 W. Addison
Posts: 400
surfing the web

A small piece of info I read about dysfunctional comprehension .

I'm not even sure if this is true , but if it is ..... WTF !

If you count all the ( built , under construction , proposed high rise , skyscrapers in Philly , the total comes to something
like 18 buildings over 500' for a city of 134 sq. mi. and roughly some 1,562,000 residents ..... In it's self , not bad , I guess .

BUT , when you compare it to a city roughly 55 sq. mi. and a population of some 430,000 and read where it may have about
50 buildings over 500' .....

Wanna guess what city it is
__________________


.....Words that are heavy with trouble :
" Tinker to Evers to Chance ."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10142  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 11:19 PM
wcphil wcphil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 55
Denver?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10143  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2016, 11:26 PM
Frontst17 Frontst17 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 304
Miami
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10144  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 12:16 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outta here View Post
A small piece of info I read about dysfunctional comprehension .

I'm not even sure if this is true , but if it is ..... WTF !

If you count all the ( built , under construction , proposed high rise , skyscrapers in Philly , the total comes to something
like 18 buildings over 500' for a city of 134 sq. mi. and roughly some 1,562,000 residents ..... In it's self , not bad , I guess .

BUT , when you compare it to a city roughly 55 sq. mi. and a population of some 430,000 and read where it may have about
50 buildings over 500' .....

Wanna guess what city it is
I would assume either Miami or San Francisco. You gotta take into account multiple things when looking at the number of tall buildings in a city like the Metropolitan area size, the economy of the area, the location of the area, any height limits, etc.

Miami and San Francisco both have similar metropolitan area sizes to Philadelphia. Size of the city itself is almost irrelevant due to differing square mileage of city limits. Also, San Francisco and Miami and sitting on water, and are more limited in their land/real estate opportunists. Therefore, instead of having more room to build outward, the only option is to build up. Also, as we all know, the economy of Philadelphia has not been great in the past, and has only recently started to turn around in both population growth and job growth. This will certainly hamper high rise construction. Lastly, Philadelphia essentially had a height limit until 1986/87; the "Gentleman's Agreement" that you could not build higher than City Hall (548' tall). So really, Philadelphia has only been building taller than 500 feet since 1987. Miami and San Francisco have certainly had a head start. Miami has been BOOMING lately when it comes to tall buildings. Let's compare to San Francisco.

Philadelphia
Over 500 feet built before 1986: 2
Over 500 feet built after 1987: 9
Buildings under construction/proposed over 500 feet: 7

San Francisco
Over 500 feet built before 1986: 16
Over 500 feet built after 1987: 3
Buildings under construction/proposed over 500 feet: 9

I'm confident if it wasn't for the "Gentlemen's Agreement" Philadelphia would certainly have more buildings over 500 feet tall as you can see how many San Francisco added prior to 1987. Philadelphia has actually built more post 1987. And their current amount of 500 footers under construction/proposed is very similar.

Miami is a different city and story entirely.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10145  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 12:18 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by wcphil View Post
Denver?
Denver only has 7 buildings over 500 feet tall and one under construction and none proposed.

Philadelphia has 11 buildings over 500 feet tall and 3 under construction with 4 proposed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10146  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 1:42 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10147  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 1:56 AM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
I cannot wait to see some of these small companies get strong enough legs to start taking their own office space. These co-working spaces will be transformational for the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10148  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 4:32 AM
jjv007 jjv007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
I would assume either Miami or San Francisco. You gotta take into account multiple things when looking at the number of tall buildings in a city like the Metropolitan area size, the economy of the area, the location of the area, any height limits, etc.

Miami and San Francisco both have similar metropolitan area sizes to Philadelphia. Size of the city itself is almost irrelevant due to differing square mileage of city limits. Also, San Francisco and Miami and sitting on water, and are more limited in their land/real estate opportunists. Therefore, instead of having more room to build outward, the only option is to build up. Also, as we all know, the economy of Philadelphia has not been great in the past, and has only recently started to turn around in both population growth and job growth. This will certainly hamper high rise construction. Lastly, Philadelphia essentially had a height limit until 1986/87; the "Gentleman's Agreement" that you could not build higher than City Hall (548' tall). So really, Philadelphia has only been building taller than 500 feet since 1987. Miami and San Francisco have certainly had a head start. Miami has been BOOMING lately when it comes to tall buildings. Let's compare to San Francisco.

Philadelphia
Over 500 feet built before 1986: 2
Over 500 feet built after 1987: 9
Buildings under construction/proposed over 500 feet: 7

San Francisco
Over 500 feet built before 1986: 16
Over 500 feet built after 1987: 3
Buildings under construction/proposed over 500 feet: 9

I'm confident if it wasn't for the "Gentlemen's Agreement" Philadelphia would certainly have more buildings over 500 feet tall as you can see how many San Francisco added prior to 1987. Philadelphia has actually built more post 1987. And their current amount of 500 footers under construction/proposed is very similar.

Miami is a different city and story entirely.
Well-thought out post, Summers. Setting 1987 as a date is somewhat arbitrary though in favor of Philadelphia, because right after that is when Philly got I don't know, like 6 towers over 500 ft. in a span of about five years. Since then, things have definitely been relatively slow for both cities in that category until recently. Still, great points and I think they're so many factors so it's hard to compare cities but Philly is definitely on the upswing at this point in time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10149  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 7:38 AM
StreetsDept StreetsDept is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 4


The National's got a fun view during construction!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10150  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 3:54 PM
Boku Boku is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 770
GE said to pick Boston for headquarters

http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2016...rocess/ZYZSu7GorfVTRXM2ZIaabJ/story.html

Oh well!

Quote:
GE’s choice cements Boston as a hub of innovation in technology and life sciences. The city’s concentration of high-powered universities and tech firms proved to be a big draw for the company.
I wonder if there was a serious effort to draw them to Philly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10151  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 5:28 PM
Flyers2001 Flyers2001 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 859
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjv007 View Post
Well-thought out post, Summers. Setting 1987 as a date is somewhat arbitrary though in favor of Philadelphia, because right after that is when Philly got I don't know, like 6 towers over 500 ft. in a span of about five years. Since then, things have definitely been relatively slow for both cities in that category until recently. Still, great points and I think they're so many factors so it's hard to compare cities but Philly is definitely on the upswing at this point in time.
1987 was set because its when the "Gentlemen's Agreement" came to an end. The 6 towers over 500' built right after was the direct result of the cancellation.

What can be concluded by the 1987-1991 boom was there would have been taller high-rises built prior if not for the "agreement".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10152  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 6:40 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boku View Post
GE said to pick Boston for headquarters

http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2016...rocess/ZYZSu7GorfVTRXM2ZIaabJ/story.html

Oh well!



I wonder if there was a serious effort to draw them to Philly.
I doubt it. Our city and state government is so short sighted they probably didn't even attempt to contact them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10153  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 6:42 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
Walker & Dunlop to open office in Center City
Quote:
Another real estate firm is migrating to Philadelphia with an eye toward opening up an office this year.

Walker & Dunlop, which finances multifamily acquisitions and development through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, also has an investment sales division that it is growing and Philadelphia is on its list of cities it wants to venture into.

Interest from institutional players is on the rise in Philadelphia because of several factors, he said. It comes from the city becoming a place where people want to live in spite of its modest job growth. Investors have also found they can find more value here compared with some other gateway cities, such as New York, Washington D.C., or Boston, where prices are high and yields are low. In addition, compared with other cities, it doesn’t appear Philadelphia is getting over built, he said.

He expects to open an office here over the next 12 months and has already started to approach some brokers at area firms but declined to name names. Walker & Dunlop will join a bevy of other commercial real estate firms that have entered the Philadelphia market in recent years.
http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/...ate-firm-seeks-to-plant-presence-in.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10154  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 7:02 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
I doubt it. Our city and state government is so short sighted they probably didn't even attempt to contact them.
True. Harvard, MIT, etc., are great name-dropping assets for Boston, but Philly actually has more higher education institutions than Boston. I do think that Boston did have a geographical advantage. A move from Connecticut made Boston and NY area options the least disruptive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10155  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 7:03 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
Hopefully the jobs "chicken" will follow the residential "egg."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10156  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 7:28 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight Hospitaller View Post
Hopefully the jobs "chicken" will follow the residential "egg."
There is job growth here- the issue is the rate. I really don't much stock in to references dropped in articles without any context. Is Philly job growth all that slow compared to other cities in the NE quadrant of the US? I'm not so sure. Is it slow compared to sunbelt cities- very likely.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10157  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 9:28 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1487 View Post
There is job growth here- the issue is the rate. I really don't much stock in to references dropped in articles without any context. Is Philly job growth all that slow compared to other cities in the NE quadrant of the US? I'm not so sure. Is it slow compared to sunbelt cities- very likely.
Yes, it's the rate. Jobs are not driving the residential market, but at some point the residential market is hopefully going to lead to employers locating near their prospective employees.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10158  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2016, 1:38 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
Wilma Theater Announces $10M for New Facade, Public Cafe



http://philly.curbed.com/archives/2016/0...edesign-cafe-education-center-facade.php
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10159  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2016, 3:23 AM
kingtut kingtut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
I doubt it. Our city and state government is so short sighted they probably didn't even attempt to contact them.
Your right on about that . Our local leaders in the state and local governments are the least sagacious elected representatives anywhere .As far GE HQ was not such a good idea as they would be reminded of their past glory after selling their crown jewel to Comcast when looking up at Comcast /NBC Universal Building.I think Boston was in their design from the very start and they needed to regain some of their lost prestige by having a Boston address .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10160  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2016, 4:10 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
9 Presidential Blvd - Bala Cynwyd

More for the City Avenue area. Definitely another step in the right direction in creating a midrise/highrise urban strip between Philadelphia and Montgomery County. 5 story 180,000 sq ft new office building will replace a two story outdated office building with more urban street frontage and retail.



http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/19436363/9-Presidential-Blvd-Bala-Cynwyd-PA/
http://www.mainlinemedianews.com/article...times/news/doc55843b52734bd248388386.txt

400 West Elm - Conshohocken

340,000 sq ft 7 floor office building. Again more positive developments for Conshohocken to add to the 3 tower massive development at Fayette and Elm in Conshy.



http://400westelm.com/

List of 6 massive Philly suburb projects:
https://www.bisnow.com/philadelphia/news...-going-on-in-the-burbs-54524?single-page

Last edited by summersm343; Jan 14, 2016 at 5:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:20 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.