HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


    The Stack in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2015, 4:24 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrequent Poster View Post

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD BUILD SOME TALLER BLOODY BUILDINGS!!!

Right on!

Last edited by Vin; Aug 11, 2015 at 5:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2015, 12:33 AM
Ridgerunner Ridgerunner is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 144
not just taller

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Right on!
not just taller please. Seattle has announced some 102 story tower next to their 76 story tower.

but it looks like just a spire going up.

I would much rather have a series of 60 story building that are really innovative.

There is a cluster of GREAT designs proposed for west Georgia. I love those .. repeat .. love those.

The city of van should be encouraged to make those west Georgia buildings happen.

Great design, not just height make for a great city.

Kudos to the people who put up the BC Tel building on Georgia at Seymour/Richards. The cantilever over Seymour is brilliant.

Give people who do that density options, reduced amenity costs, fast track planning and approval ... with my blessing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2015, 1:15 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridgerunner View Post
not just taller please. Seattle has announced some 102 story tower next to their 76 story tower. .....but it looks like just a spire going up.

I would much rather have a series of 60 story building that are really innovative.................

There is a cluster of GREAT designs proposed for west Georgia. I love those .. repeat .. love those............
The city of van should be encouraged to make those west Georgia buildings happen.

Great design, not just height make for a great city.
...........
Yes!! People have this thing about HEIGHT .... and it's so unreal, becuase sooner or later someone will build a taller one somewhere. I think height is good,
but am totally against height for height's sake. Good design is really where it's at, be it tall or not so tall. (IMO)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 7:56 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridgerunner View Post
not just taller please. Seattle has announced some 102 story tower next to their 76 story tower.

but it looks like just a spire going up.

I would much rather have a series of 60 story building that are really innovative.

There is a cluster of GREAT designs proposed for west Georgia. I love those .. repeat .. love those.

The city of van should be encouraged to make those west Georgia buildings happen.

Great design, not just height make for a great city.

Kudos to the people who put up the BC Tel building on Georgia at Seymour/Richards. The cantilever over Seymour is brilliant.

Give people who do that density options, reduced amenity costs, fast track planning and approval ... with my blessing.

I like the skyline to vary in heights, and a series of 60 storey buildings just don't work for me (no matter how innovative they are), especially if you view the city from afar. Table-topping as most call it is definitely a no-no for me. When people call for taller structures, why would others immediately jump to the conclusion and automatically assume that they don't care about the aesthetics? Can't a building be really tall and beautiful as well?

BTW, BC Tel is a rather old school name. It's called Telus now. And I do love this building, but many others don't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 3:57 AM
Ridgerunner Ridgerunner is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 144
old dog, new tricks and all that

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
I like the skyline to vary in heights, and a series of 60 storey buildings just don't work for me (no matter how innovative they are), especially if you view the city from afar. Table-topping as most call it is definitely a no-no for me. When people call for taller structures, why would others immediately jump to the conclusion and automatically assume that they don't care about the aesthetics? Can't a building be really tall and beautiful as well?

BTW, BC Tel is a rather old school name. It's called Telus now. And I do love this building, but many others don't.
BC tel they were and BC Tel they shall remain.

Anyway, i agree with you that the new building is a great addition.

In particular, I love the cantilever that is out over the street. What a great way to "un box" the structure.

I hope that the new Melville building at least tries to do something unusual.

Vancouver has enough tall buildings and enough boxes... and especially enough tall boxes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2015, 4:08 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridgerunner View Post
BC tel they were and BC Tel they shall remain.

Anyway, i agree with you that the new building is a great addition.

In particular, I love the cantilever that is out over the street. What a great way to "un box" the structure.

I hope that the new Melville building at least tries to do something unusual.

Vancouver has enough tall buildings and enough boxes... and especially enough tall boxes.
Yup, isn't the BC Tel tower great? The area is sizzling with really vibrant urban energy, more than any other downtown office tower developments. Love the contrasts of the boxes and the wood arch, complete with LED lighting.

For this Melville tower, the height restrictions somehow make it look rather fat (I know it's not designed to allowable height). It would be nice to have a skinnier but taller tower, at 50% more height, but with a plaza surrounded by a food centre and cafe/shops at the base. That would help bring some life to that corner of Melville. The skyline would also look amazing with the tower protruding from those stout towers in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:47 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.