HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2013, 11:42 PM
Kotliz's Avatar
Kotliz Kotliz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 101
Super Tall?

Frankly I'd be excited to see some 250–400 footers, with really good ground-level attractions filling these empty lots, before some sort of extra tall building (750+ feet) sucks up all the oxygen. Although I suspect some of those lots might be in a capital view corridor.


Last edited by Kotliz; Oct 18, 2013 at 11:44 PM. Reason: Changed my mind about point.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2013, 2:43 AM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,162
I am sorry, but I don't think a super tall ever looks tacky. I know by definition it isn't(or maybe it is, I am too lazy to look up its height) a supertall, but Devon Tower in Oklahoma City does not look tacky, at all. It might look a little out of place, but it looks freaking awesome compared to the rest of the skyline, its not like a 1,000 ft tower in Pflugerville.

Austin's skyline is plenty filled-out and has enough height to look amazing with a 700-1,000 ft tower.

And if any person on here saw that a 1,000 ft tower was being constructed in Austin and were....eh....about it, I would die in astonishment. It would look bad ass and all ya'll know that
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2013, 3:25 AM
Kotliz's Avatar
Kotliz Kotliz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtown,man View Post
I am sorry, but I don't think a super tall ever looks tacky. I know by definition it isn't (or maybe it is, I am too lazy to look up its height) a supertall, but Devon Tower in Oklahoma City does not look tacky, at all. It might look a little out of place, but it looks freaking awesome compared to the rest of the skyline, its not like a 1,000 ft tower in Pflugerville.

Austin's skyline is plenty filled-out and has enough height to look amazing with a 700-1,000 ft tower.

And if any person on here saw that a 1,000 ft tower was being constructed in Austin and were....eh....about it, I would die in astonishment. It would look bad ass and all ya'll know that
To me it's not that a very tall building itself would look tacky, it's what it would do to the skyline as a whole. The Devon Tower is a lovely building but the city skyline as a whole, because of the inclusion of that 840 foot tower, looks kinda silly and out of scale. Most likely, when the city grows up around it, it will fit in better, but I don't think that's a particularly pretty skyline.



Original [http://vimeo.com/49098366]

Last edited by Kotliz; Oct 19, 2013 at 3:42 AM. Reason: added video url.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:38 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.