HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations



Related Pages:  • Los Angeles Projects & Construction Forum  • Los Angeles Highrise Developments Map


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2011, 11:41 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by mello View Post
Why would it take four years? He can show the books for the previous owner. Plus since he paid the least amount for an NFL franchise (Forbes had JAX valued as the lowest of all 32 teams) it gives him and AEG more wiggle room for a legal battle. If he had paid the average 1 billion (according to Forbes) then spending 200 million getting out of the lease would be prohibitive but he didn't spend a huge amount up front.

...
Like I said, if they do move, it won't be in the immediate future. In other words, the sale has no relevance as far as precluding the Chargers from moving. In other words, you (and I) better hope that the Chargers are able to get a stadium ballot measure passed next year.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2011, 1:33 AM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westsidelife View Post
Like I said, if they do move, it won't be in the immediate future. In other words, the sale has no relevance as far as precluding the Chargers from moving. In other words, you (and I) better hope that the Chargers are able to get a stadium ballot measure passed next year.
Oh come on, the Chargers wouldn't be that bad. I mean, I won't be interested in them, but without Norv Turner they might at least be a tad more relevant. I'm just anxiously waiting to see who wins the NFC LA sweepstakes.
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2011, 6:09 AM
yeah215 yeah215 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 228
The problem with the Chargers (or Raiders for that matter) is that they are California teams. At which point, we are redistributing wealth withing state. I would rather have a new team come to LA. That way, all benefits would be new.
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2011, 1:54 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeah215 View Post
The problem with the Chargers (or Raiders for that matter) is that they are California teams. At which point, we are redistributing wealth withing state. I would rather have a new team come to LA. That way, all benefits would be new.
Yea but if your team is getting low attendance, then how much wealth is really being "redistributed"?

The fact is the Chargers and/or Raiders might be leaving whether LA gets them or not. So why not go for it?
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
End
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:15 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.