Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller
City Presentation from the City's website.
I hadn't realized that the 425' sites at Granville Bridgehead were the ones closer to the water and the upland 300' sites are remaining the same. I think I'd rather have the two upland sites increased and the ones closer to the water increased only to 300'.
That would reduce the "in your face" aspect of the current proposals.
http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/2010...tunitiesforHigherBuildingsintheDownt.pdf |
Isn't the point of the proposal to be that of a bold "gateway" statement when entering the city?
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
|
Threaded Mode