Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext
As fellow posters can vouch, I'm about as far from a "fellow traveller" of Gordo as you can get, but I support Site C wholeheartedly.
Conservation will only get us so far, in the face of an increasing population with an increasing amount of electronic devices. Its amazing the legacy of the 1950's and 60's has brought us so far in the light of things such as server farms for instance. We also stand on the threshold of the time when electric cars are a reality to replace the internal combustion engine for many drivers. Far better to be ahead of this curve than behind it.
|
We'll just have to disagree on that.
The growing use of electric cars will certainly be more than conservation can handle, but that is where other alternatives must come into play. After that I'll consider Site C.
I'm starting to wonder whether Site C is in fact only meant to supply the US market.
Threaded Mode