Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse
There isn't any "gold standard" for a metro line, and if there was it would be at least 1km. The average stop spacing of both the Montreal Metro and Toronto Subway is about 1km, while it's about 1.5km on the Expo line, the oldest and busiest Skytrain line.
Claiming it has to have one particular arbitrary goal is just dogmatism which has no place is transit planning.
|
800 m is extremely well supported. I'd expect people on this board to know about this kind of stuff, but since we're starting from zero, please read something like this:
https://tram.mcgill.ca/Research/Publ...rvice_area.pdf
Based on how far people tend to walk, 800 m all but ensures that most people living (including all things we do while alive) on top of the line will use it. 800 m spacing puts every stop a five minute walk from every location along the line, assuming the line follows a walkable route.
This means the line can sustain a dense urban environment along its length.
There are many places--suburbs, mountainous cities, totalitarian countries--where metro stops are much further apart. These tend not to support sustained, dense urban environments.
Again, if you prefer towers in suburbia over sustained urbanity, that's your prerogative. I feel like living in the kind of suburban tower megadevelopments found in places like Vaughan and Burnaby would be a kind of prison. I like Bloor more than Lawrence. I like Yonge south of Eglington more than I like it north of Eglington. Both areas I like have stop spacing around 500 - 600 m.
Given the assumption that transit development is, in part, a carrot for development, the vast distances between stops out in the suburbs don't make the case you think they do because they'll never support anything I'd live near. I'd find trains zooming by just out of reach extremely frustrating. Anecdotally, I know people who lived in DC--in dense, urban neighbourhoods that predated their metro service--and hated that the metro passed beneath their feet but didn't offer meaningful service.
You may like that though. If this comes down to a difference of taste, that's fine.
But if you agree that transit should support continuous, dense, walkable urbanity, you should know that 800 m stop spacing does so. And, on a macro scale, that's what gets the most riders.