Posted Apr 10, 2023, 4:00 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav
There should definitely be a vacant land penalty, IMO. Land is supposed to be used, not held up by a future plan. If an owner/developer isn't ready to build, then sell it to someone who is. If we are taxing empty homes, vacant land should be as well (don't get me started on the dog parks or community gardens, these developers should be getting on with building and not just sitting on the land). I understand things come up and developers might hit a roadblock, but demolishing existing buildings just to have land sit empty is insane in a city like this, and there should be rules against it.
|
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/1401-robson-street-vancouver
1401 Robson
|
Threaded Mode