Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar
Sounds like you are proposing a solution for a problem that DOESN'T exist!
With so few people living in the north and an unhospitable climate and geography the cost be outweigh any benefits!
|
I would think that despite the massive cost it could be something to consider, given that the north is of strategic importance. I think also that bringing down the cost of living in far flung communities would be a net positive over time.
Obviously things are pretty rough in terms of geography and climate, but if we made the cost of resource extraction lower, it could be a positive overall. I think there's a case to be made for it politically, and perhaps business wise in the long run.
Threaded Mode