HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2022, 7:13 PM
LO 044's Avatar
LO 044 LO 044 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,550
There are pros and cons with WS trying to fortify YYC. Calgary simply isn't big enough to handle a base airline plus other international airlines like YVR, YYZ and YUL. But with WS you at least have non-stop service or multiple options per day to places you would never have if YYC wasn't a hub for WS. Maybe you have double daily service (KL and WS) to AMS and then WS replaces KL from YVR and YEG I dunno.

One of the benefits I find with flying AC is that if my flight is delayed or cancelled they have multiple options and hubs for that matter to get me home. If you miss your AMS-YYC flight due to a late flight on KL you are covered by maybe flying to YEG or YVR and then connecting to YYC. I would imagine this would also keep any "business paying" customer happy as well. If something happens to the FCO-YYC or BCN-YYC flight then what? I suppose AF/KL will help you but it just seems more seamless with a true hub in AMS. I would liken this to AC's numerous flights out of FRA, LHR and MUC.

ace.yyc do you have any info on loads/peerformance/cargo loads on the FCO and BCN flights relative to say CDG and LGW/LHR?
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:40 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.