All good points, and I think we seem to be coming closer to agreeing.
The big difference is you seem to think this project is urgent and I am not quite sure what the rush is. I feel like Lansdowne 1.0 was rushed and we ended up with an incomplete development, hence the need for a Lansdowne 2.0. I don't want to see a Lansdowne 3.0 in a decade to fix the problems with Lansdowne 2.0.
All good points, and I think we seem to be coming closer to agreeing. 
Threaded Mode