HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 10, 2022, 12:40 AM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newark, California
Posts: 7,219
The tax break is attached to the building, not the development team. Obviously the sales price is reflected by its tax structure but I'm not an appraiser.

I suppose the issue is whether the amount of affordable housing (the public benefits) is equal to the tax abatement they receive with Goldwater and the city at opposite ends of the spectrum. The last judge did not agree that the public benefits received were enough in tossing the last GPLET but the same incentive structure is applied here.

I'm sure the case might have merits but it's hard to take Goldwater seriously when they championship themselves against "crony capitalism" as they fight the deal that's afforded to nearly everyone who applies for it. I wish those people had something better to do with their time. Maybe the Arizona Commerce Authority should stop advertising the GPLET as some incentive if it's just going to get prospective investors sued by busybodies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:47 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.