I don't think projects should get a pass just because it's better than what's there now. Same point goes for the size of the investment. Those ways of thinking are the reason why Rogers was able to build their giant sea of parking next to a suburban two floor call centre in the heart of the city. Same thinking lead to the giant suburban Sobeys at the most prominent intersection in the area. Am I glad those two companies invested in the area, created jobs, and improved the land? Absolutely. Could we have ended up with designs that were more urban in character, inline with the streetscape, pedestrian friendly, and a more efficient use of land? Absolutely. Missed opportunities.
I'm very happy to see this project being put forward. Even as it is, I think it would be a huge improvement to that area, I don't think questioning some design decisions or pushing the envelope is being negative in the least.
__________________
"When you go home tonight, there's gonna be another story on your house! "
|