Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan
i'd like to hear an honest consensus architectural assessment from san franciscans of saleforce's new SF tower, not the highly selective and self-reinforcing feedback loop responses given to us by someone who CLEARLY has an axe to grind.
i myself feel like it's the crowning peak the SF skyline has desperately needed as it grew ever more "plateau-ish" over the decades since the heady days of transamerica and BofA.
but i'm just an internet skyscraper nerd from chicago, not a san franciscan, so what do i know?
|
My opinion: love the height and proportions (i.e. a tower on that site of that height and width is exactly what SF's skyline needed), dislike how bland and generic and melt-y/round-y it looks. I liked the SOM proposal much better.
Threaded Mode