Quote:
Originally Posted by gillynova
Salesforce Tower needs a sibling and I was hoping this would rise up this year  |
Actually, a big consideration is whether Salesforce itself still wants to enlarge its campus with more space. We previously were told they were interested in a lease here but were likely kept from formalizing anything by the already-apparent troubles of the developer. Now, if some American outfit that is serious comes along and Salesforce starts taking to them, it could come together.
But partly that depends on whether Salesforce still believes it needs the space, even with the work-from-home phenomenon and at the moment I don't think we know the answer to that.
As to not using the Foster design, in SF that would be problematic I would think. The entitlements exist and a redesign would likely require starting over. We all know how nit-picky the Planning Dept. is. Does anyone seriously think they would allow something completely different to go up without going through the planning process again (and that might even mean a new Prop. M allocation)?
Threaded Mode