HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2020, 11:27 PM
Marshal Marshal is offline
perhaps . . .
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,493
Building 4 instead of 6 is unfortunate and mostly political. Regardless, if you can't understand New West not wanting even more traffic (look at a map to see how New West already is a traffic pinch point in 4-6 different directions) you are missing the possibility for proper planning. The real problem for New West is not the bridge but the capacity of McBride. The ideal would be 6 lanes with Mcbride in a cut and cover to 10th, then a Burnaby connector to HWY1. New West Planning would support that, but the Stormont Connector (once a future priority) has fallen completely off the radar. So New West wants 4 lanes until something is done to improve the network on their side. Building 4 and a future 6 pacifies them, but also wastes funding and ultimate construction disruptions.

But it will be 4, expandable to 6 . . . time to get over it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.