HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2019, 8:17 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
You can’t count a bridge that hasn’t even got a shovel in the ground yet. And it’s just a replacement isn’t it? No extra capacity?
Wider lanes mean higher speeds and fewer collisions so it'll have extra capacity even though there aren't additional lanes. And it'll be built to be expandable, just like the AFB was.

And it turns out that planning out a bridge is a long and complicated process, you can't just put shovels in the ground and build it. The planning process started years and years ago, during the Liberals' time in power. I wouldn't consider replacing an aging and dangerous bridge to be a win for either party, really, just a project that really needs to get finished.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:41 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.