HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2019, 1:35 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Yeah, I remember that, but it makes much more sense to have a dedicated RoW rather than in-street, especially when the Option Lands cut the corner, avoid a 90 degree turn and line up exactly with the proposed access road into Senakw.
Also, at that time, the scope of the Senakw development was not known and the possibility of an extension into Senakw was not necessarily as much of a priority as it may be now.
That Policy deals with the "Arbutus Greenway" - which probably focuses on the route turning to the south, not to the west.
The report deals with the Option Lands of the Arbutus Greenway, just as the notice fredinno posted above says. That's where the housing is proposed. The report says that the Engineers are not looking to use that route for either Greenway or streetcar purposes.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:15 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.