HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2019, 2:40 PM
moorhosj moorhosj is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockerzzz View Post
^ Just a political memo to make it seem like the Blank Check Amendment is needed. These cuts won’t happen, post the actual cuts when they’re signed into the budget.
Can't please anybody around here. As a voter, I like the idea of having more data about the consequences of my vote on the tax amendment, regardless of the motives.

A quick reminder that our last governor literally blocked his agency heads from suggesting any budget cuts.

Quote:
Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner said Tuesday that Senate Democrats must make "real spending cuts" in their proposed budget compromise, just hours before his agency directors refused to offer suggestions for reductions when asked by Senate committees.
Quote:
Rauner's office would not comment on why the cabinet members were not allowed to speak.
Which is more fiscally responsible, proposing a tax increase and spelling out the cuts that will happen without it OR calling for "real spending cuts", while blocking people from actually proposing any cuts?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:55 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.