HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2019, 7:07 PM
zrx299 zrx299 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
Overall I'm for reducing light pollution especially areas surrounding DT, and I'm not opposed to shutting building lights off after a certain amount of time (not at midnight, makes Austin seem sleepy and inactive when we are most certainly not after midnight.) 2 a.m. is reasonable. But DT is the center and heart and should be lit at night. If the rest of the city reduces light pollution by say 25% even if DT is the brightest part of the city that will still shrink the amount of light pollution in the Austin area. Also there are ways that buildings can be lit that reduces light pollution such as above light coverings and aiming light in such a way that there isn't a lot of residual light escaping.
Those awful outdated sodium vapor orange "cobra head" street lights, and especially those giant high mast tower lights used on interstates are the big culprits of light pollution. Moving to LEDs that are properly shielded and angled will continue to cut down on this, but we got a long way to go.

Decorative LED strips, landscape lighting, and properly angled colored LED "wall washes" are not a significant contributor to light pollution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.