HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2019, 10:22 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
Furthermore, hydroelectric power is extremely cost-effective to operate and facilities have long service lives, both of which are attractive to BC Hydro as an operator, not just a power purchaser.

With that said, the cost of Site C is truly remarkable compared to the amount of power it will produce. 680MW, if that's accurate, honestly isn't very much production capacity for a facility allegedly to exceed $10B in capital costs. [Edit: the Site C website says that dam will produce about 1,100MW and the estimated construction cost was $7.9B($2011)]
Site C is a new dam being built in an enviro-hippy, non-French part of Canada, in the 21st Century.

I'm surprised it's actually going forwards.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:45 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.