Quote:
Originally Posted by City Wide
Isn't Boni just serving the needs of his clients, so to speak? Just another hired —, where the real issue is the people who write the checks that pay the hired —?
I know that there are some law suits that question whether a variance was given out in the proper way and other similar matters, that have taken years and years to unroll through the courts. But so far it sounds like the complaint is saying things like the code requires a set back of 25' (just a guess) and this project shows a set back of 23'. I would like to think that somebody with a tape measure could resolve that type of issue pretty fast. If it were only that easy! But getting the easy issues out of the way early and quickly might allow this project to get started, as mentioned in a posting above while the hired — fight it out about the more complicated points.
This needs to be built.
|
I'm sure he would say that. It depends how baseless the lawsuits are. We cannot file frivolous, bad faith lawsuits because our clients want us to and will pay us to do so. There would really have to be no legal merit to the Association's arguments to stop the build. A flawed but reasonable interpretation probably doesn't have to do. I wonder if they can do a redesign that will moot all the arguments but still be viable.
Threaded Mode