Posted Sep 18, 2018, 8:33 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,297
|
|
Going to have to agree with Dan on this, based on my experience. I was part of one of the design teams for the Calgary Law Courts, and the requirements for almost everything related to that project were dictated by Alberta Infrastructure in conjunction with the Solicitor General. There was leeway as to the physical design of the building obviously but very specific quidelines for almost every component of that project. Teams dared not stray from the requirements as it was made clear that packages that did not meet the specific criteria set out in the request for submissions would be rejected
|
Threaded Mode