I seem to recall that the purpose of the 100 foot mast on top of Harbour Centre was to replicate a ship's mast. It is not an antennae or aerial, altho there are several aerials just below it but they're not part of the mast. So I'm claiming the mast is strictly ornamental which according to WipperSnapper's rules means that the 100 feet should count towards bldgs height, but he demands "evidence". Anyone got any?
Threaded Mode