Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive
I'm happy to take the other side of this argument. I'll start here:
|
I don't necessarily agree that this is the right project for the neighborhood. But your example of the process in Curtis Park is different. In CP they had LPC design review to give them some leverage. And the building is still going in. The RNO did not try to revoke a permit.
In City Park West they want to stop it entirely. I know the developer won't work with them and they don't have LPC to review it. So they want to revoke a permit, which I think is very risky for the city. I think they just need to suck it up and get ready for a bunch of new neighbors.
My biggest beef with the neighbors is that this whole thing started because they are afraid of losing their free parking. Why should the expect the developer to pay for parking when they are not willing to do the same?
Threaded Mode