Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P.
I note that the comments (except for the usual silly ramble from JWC) are mostly saying, forget it, let's get something new. Perhaps the tide has turned and these buildings are the price we pay for no longer protecting empty lots from development.
|
I wouldn't expect much different from the Herald's commentariat, who tend to be really conservatively reactionary on almost everything.
The Facebook commentary is more half-and-half, and Twitter is solidly pro-preservation. It's interesting how these things self-sort.
In any case, virtually every commenter misses the main point, which is that this is a wildly out-of-date development strategy. I wish the editors had given it a headline more in keeping with that...
Threaded Mode