HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2015, 9:03 PM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveosnyder View Post
I agree -- it is the person who is responsible for their choices, but the environment plays a major role in their choices. If this wasn't the case then those same people who get in accidents because of their bad choices would get in accidents all over the street network. But that's not the case, we have specific places that more accidents occur. Because those places are the poorly designed areas, the ones that we should and need to work on.

We will never eliminate all traffic accidents through design. All in all, environment isn't responsible for choices, but it does affect outcome. Build safe streets and we get less accidents, no matter the stupidity of our driving population.
Weren't you arguing a while back against "better designed" roadways, saying that a City of Winnipeg rail grade separation should have narrower lanes, steeper grades, and no accel-decel lanes because it was a waste of money and space?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.