HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2014, 3:09 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dado View Post
Once the carriageways are separated by enough space that a vehicle can cross each carriageway separately, a lot of the risk involved in an at-grade intersection is removed since drivers only have to consider traffic coming from one direction at a time. Moreover, by only needing to consider one direction at a time, there's going to be a much higher number of crossing opportunities, leading to less impatience and risk-taking. That's probably why it's so "surprising" that there aren't more accidents.

The risks associated with turning movements can be reduced by adding deceleration/acceleration lanes.
Agreed. The majority of fatal collisions are non-intersection. Medians, carriage separation, shoulder barriers/warnings should be more of a focus than trying to turn rural highways into full grade-separated freeways or Super-2s. (400 is a different story, referring more to the TCH)
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.