Quote:
Originally Posted by Mininari
There are plenty of people who don't want to see it replaced, or at least replaced with expanded capacity. Nonetheless, you don't replace something that is as congested as the GMT without additional capacity.
Hence, yes, the more reasons to replace it (even if not needed through common sense), the more you justify expanding it at the same time.
|
My uncle's father was on the engineering team that designed the tunnel and they pushed for 6 lanes at that time.
At present you have 7 northbound lanes all merging into 1 lane at rush hour.
The people who don't see a case for any additional capacity are beyond myopic, especially when you are building out for 75-100 years.
The lineup for the Alex Fraser bridge is frequently 6+ km in the morning (2km on Nordel, 2km on 91, 2km on the SFPR connecting road).
Threaded Mode