HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 6, 2013, 3:35 PM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by StethJeff View Post
Way too much concrete. Too many streets passing through. Too many stairs rather than a gradual slope. Parking ramps. Way too much concrete. Not enough grass.

The fountain is fine. The flags are a nice touch. Love the Starbucks. That isn't much considering everything that's wrong with it. Want to love it, but can't. Anyway, just my opinion.
Frankly, for an urban park, trees are more important than grass. I normally avoid comparisons with other cities, but I'll provide New York as an example. Most of Manhattan’s parks that are widely used have minimal grass, but lots of trees. Urban parks also work well when they have plenty of patio and seating areas. They should serve as gathering spots for people on their way from one place to the other. Gathering spots are more important than lawns.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:29 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.