HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2012, 4:29 AM
bmfarley's Avatar
bmfarley bmfarley is offline
Long-Time Californian
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California; All Over
Posts: 1,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westsidelife View Post
Guggenheim, the new Dodgers ownership group, has made it clear to their fans that they have no intention of moving to a new ballpark. Thank goodness is all I have to say. Baseball may be an urban sport, but Dodger Stadium has a unique 1950's/1960's retro character that is emblematic of the franchise's golden age. No it's not Fenway or Wrigley, but it has history and nostalgia in its own right. Every other stadium being built these days is more or less the same sterile theme park. I don't want that for my team.

PS, the Angels aren't moving to DT or anywhere in LA County. Since their WS win in 2002, they've carved up their own niche fanbase down in OC. Moving to LA would never fly with the fans.

Next.
I'd become an Angel fan if they moved to Los Angeles. National League baseball stinks.
__________________
- Think Big, Go Big. Think small, stay small.
- Don't get sucked into a rabbit's hole.
- Freeways build sprawl. Transit builds cities.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.