Quote:
Originally Posted by Old&New
Those parcels are still part of this project.
|
I was referring to NAC's property at 400 W and 500 S. I thought that was the property they were contributing to the project.
Maybe I am wrong (very likely). The Main St. location would be a much better location.
However, I too would like to see much of our surface parking be replaced with more productive uses. It's too bad that more isn't being developed with underground parking instead of surface lots and above grade terraces.
If you look at SLC's surface parking as "vacant lots," then we have a huge amount of potential to be filled in... maybe someday.
Threaded Mode