Quote:
Originally Posted by arkhitektor
I'm not suggesting that is has to be law, just that when the mayor and city council are looking to spend hundreds of millions of public dollars, it's something they should consider. In this case, they haven't to my satisfaction. I've read the report produced by the mayor's brother in 2008 -- it didn't convince me that the city is pursuing the best site.
|
Don't get me wrong, I agree that in a best case scenario the city ought to do things like this, i.e. consider all options and preferably list publicly why they have gone with the option they have chosen. However, human nature is to do only what is required of us, thus unless there were some law or regulation, what is the motivation to do it?
Threaded Mode