HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2011, 4:32 AM
alki alki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
This is why I don't like stucco. I am a hipster () and stucco is used as an excuse and a cheat nowadays. I have seen nice stucco buildings. Pure Spanish Revival in stucco generally looks nice. Historic stucco buildings generally look nice. Sometimes, modern buildings using clean, smooth, stucco sparingly even look nice. However, 99% of buildings going up in L.A. use stucco in a poor manner. The worst place for stucco is downtown. Historically, downtown is built with stone and terrecotta. When stucco is placed next to these much more expensive materials, it looks cheap and out of place, even when done in a way that would look nice in another place. Yes, stucco has the capability to look nice, but when it comes to downtown, keep it out.
I pretty much agree with everything you say. I definitely think stucco plays better on low and mid rise bldgs designed for residential. And I agree its most likely out of place downtown. When I was in LA, they weren't, to my knowledge, putting stucco on DTLA bldgs. To me, stucco in LA is like the overuse of reflective glass in cities like Dallas. Too much and it becomes trivialized and unattractive.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:02 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.